between Mombasa and the Forests of Taveta. 29 
Mr. Rogers says that it “does not seem really common.” 
We do not possess the male, and should be very glad to get 
more females. 
47. Stugeta Bowkert, Trimen, local form mombase. 
3 6, Mombasa, 7th and 10th February; ¢, 19th May, 
1900. 
These examples are larger and bluer than those from Natal ; 
the black on the primaries is also expanded, reducing the size 
of the white markings. On the under surface the ground- 
colour is chalky white, with hardly any grey suffusion, the 
dark markings are of a more rufescent brown varied with 
orange. As a local form I think this insect requires a 
distinctive name. 
48. Hypolycena philippus, Fabr. 
$, Mombasa, 3rd January, 1900. 
Jam not sure that the African species are typical /Typo- 
lyceene. 
49. Hypolycena pachalica, Butler. 
3, Mombasa, 28th December, 1899. 
50. Virachola antalus, Hopf. 
? ¢, Taveta, 28th October, 1899; Rabai, 9th June, 1900. 
51. Virachola dariaves, Hewits. 
6, Chaengombe, 23rd April, 1900. 
Numbered (166) by Mr. Rogers, who, however, sends no 
note respecting it ; it is rare in collections here, and we should 
be glad to get more specimens ; we do not possess the female. 
52. Spindasis victorie, Butler. 
&, Rabai, 11th June, 1900. 
“This is not uncommon at Rabai; occurs here, but seems 
to be replaced further inland by (138) ” (K. S¢. A. Tay: 
This is the first male example I have seen ; on the upper 
surface it is intermediate between S. natalensis and S. nyasse : 
on the under surface the primaries resemble those of S. nyasse, 
but on the secondaries the central band is united at an angle 
with that running from the abdominal margin; the subapical 
transverse band is abruptly widened on first subcostal branch, 
and runs nearly parallel to the central band, and the outer 
