58 Mr. F. O. P. Cambridge—A Revision 
selected by Latreille in 1810 as the type of the genus (Consid. 
gén. Nat. Ord. p. 423). 
The name florentina has priority over perfida. 
Type, Segestria florentina (Rossi), 1790. 
ARGYRONETA, Latreille, 1804, Nouv. Dict. xxiv. p. 134, 
col. 1, line 22. 
A single species only is quoted under this name, included 
in Walckenaer’s “ Nayades,” Faun. Par. p. 233. 
Type, Argyroneta aquatica (Clerck), 1757. 
GnaPuosa, Latreille, 1804, Nouv. Dict. xxiv. p. 134, col. 1, 
line 31. 
Four species were originally included, being those com- 
prised in Walckenaer’s “ Celluliformes,” Faun. Par. p. 220, 
1802 :—(1) A. nocturna, Linn.; (2) A. luctfuga, Walck., 
Sch. Icon. pl. 101. fig. 7; (3) A. lapidosa, Walck. ; 
(4) A. fulgens. 
The genus was first split up by Walckenaer himself in 
1805, who withdrew A. nocturna, Linn., A. ucifuga, Walek., 
and A. fulgens, Walck., under Drassus, ‘Tableau, p. 45, 
leaving A. lagidosa, Walck. This being the last left in 
becomes the type. It is not possible under these circum- 
stances toregard Drassus, Walck., as a synonym of Gnaphosa, 
Latr., as Simon does (Hist. Nat. Ar. 2, 1. p. 383, 1893), nor 
can the type of the latter be duczfuga, as there selected. 
Type, Gnaphosa lapidosa (Walck.), 1802. 
CLuBIONA, Latreille, 1804, Nouv. Dict. xxiv. p. 134, col. 1, 
line 39. 
Seven species were originally included, being those re- 
ferred by Walckenaer to the “ Cameriformes,” Faun. Par. 
p- 217 (1802) :—(1) Aranea atroz, De Geer; (2) A. ama- 
rantha; (3) A.aloma, Albin, pl. x. fig. 48; (4) A. erratica, 
Albin, pl. xvii. fig. 82, p. 26; (5) A. epimelas; (6) A. holo- 
sericea, De Geer, vil. p. 266, pl. xv. fig. 138; (7) A. nuérix. 
Walckenaer does not remove any of these species in the 
‘Tableau,’ and the genus was first broken up by C. L. Koch 
in 1837, who withdrew A. atrov, De Geer, as the type of 
Amaurobius, and, in 1839, A. nutriv, Walck.=punctorium, 
Villers; and erratica, Walck., under Chiracanthium, the last 
by implication. 
In 1810 Latreille selected A. /olosericea, Linn., as the 
type, a species which he obviously concluded to be identical 
