obtained chiefly at Munisu. 201 
47. Terias hapale, Mabille. 
I find that 1 was too hasty in questioning Prof. Auri- 
villius’s action with regard to this species ; the males are pale 
lemon-yellow and without brand, the females white. Probably 
T. messalina is the nearest ally. 
48. Terias Marshaili, Butler. 
49. Terias Boisduvaliana, Mabille. 
3 6, Embi, 15th February, and Munisu. 
Both examples belong to the dry phase (7. ethtopica). I 
am afraid that it will be difficult in future to decide as to 
whether a female belongs to 7. hapale or T. Boisduvaliana, 
unless the two are taken together; I believe ours are now 
all correctly sorted, but I do not feel absolutely sure. As a 
rule, I think, the under surface of 7. Boisduvaliana has more 
sharply defined (less blurred) markings than in 7. hapale. 
50. Teracolus calais, Cramer, 
) 
51. Teracolus erts, Klug. 
52. Teracolus incretus, Butler, 
A pair of the dry phase from Munisu. 
53. Teracolus auxo, Lucas. 
A pair of the dry phase from the Athi River in Central 
Kast Africa. 
D4, Leracolus wanthus, var. metagone, Holl. 
3 ¢, Athi River, Central East Africa. 
‘This is a typical dry-season phase of the species, 
99. Teracolus pseudacaste, Butler, 
3 do ¢ $, Athi River, Central East Africa, 
All the examples are of the dry-season phase. 
56, Catopsilia florella, Fabr. 
832% ¢,Munisu; gg, Embi, 15th February, 1900. 
57. Belenois zochalia, Boisd. 
3 fg, Embi, 15th February, 1900, 
