Hurter and Strecker—Amphibians and Reptiles of Arkansas. 13 
ARKANSAS LOCALITIES REFERRED TO IN THIS PAPER. 
Locality. Collector. No. of Species. 
Altus, Franklin Co. Hurter 2 
Arkadelphia, Clark Co. Meek 1 
Clarksville, Johnson Co. Meek 1 
Donaldson, Hot Springs Co. Meek 1 
Eureka Springs, Carroll Co. Hurter 3 
Fort Smith, Sebastian Co. Eustis, Whipple, 26 
Shumard, Pierson 
Fayetteville, Washington Co. Meek 5 
Greenway, Clay Co. Meek 24 
Hot Springs, Garland Co. Combs, Hurter 37 
Little Rock, Pulaski Co. Hurter, Fordyce 18 
Paragould, Green Co. Hurter 14 
Pine Bluff, Jefferson Co. Hurter 7 
Texarkana, Miller Co. Hurter 4 
Miscellaneous 9 
From the foregoing table the reader can very readily 
see that we have definite records for only about fifteen 
out of the seventy-five counties in the State. Hot 
Springs, Garland County, furnished the largest number 
of species as a result of the work of two collectors. Combs 
spent nearly three years in this locality and obtained in 
all thirty-six species and sub-species. Hurter visited 
Hot Springs on two occasions, obtaining examples of 
seventeen species, only one of which had not previously 
been collected by Combs. At Fort Smith, the earlier 
collectors, Eustis, Shumard and Whipple, obtained six 
species that were not found there by Pierson in 1896-97. 
The results of Meek’s work at Greenway, Clay County, 
and Hurter’s at Paragould, Green County, furnish an 
interesting contrast as the two counties are adjoining. 
Meek collected twenty-four species, Hurter only four- 
teen, but the two lots contain representatives of thirty- 
six different forms, Sceloporus undulatus Lat. and 
Ambystoma opacum Gravenhorst being the only two 
species obtained by both collectors. 
COMPARATIVE TABLE OF MISSOURI AND ARKANSAS REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS. 
Amphibia * Missouri. Arkansas. 
Caudata 17 14 
Salientia 15 32 13 27 
Reptilia —_ — 
Testudinata 17 14 
Ophidia 43 38 . 
Lacertilia 8 68 i | 63 
100 90 
* Based on Hurter’s list (1907). 
+ The present list. 
