EE VISION OF THE BLASTOIDEAE, WITH A PKO- 

 POSED NEW CLASSIFICATION, AND DESCRIP- 

 TION OF NEW SPECIES.* 



G. Hambach. 



ERRATA. 



7. 1. 5 read for lumen is " luraina are." 

 9. '' 18 '< " oval <'oral." 



12. " Z2 " " Fig. 5 "Figs. 8, 10 and 11." 



14. " 20 '' " Plate II fig. 2, 3, 5 " Plate II Fig. 3." 



34. '* 28 " '' Maccoy "M'Coy." 



47. "22 •' " Codastus "Codaster." 



47. footnote read for ralated " related." 



49-. 1. 10 read for impossible "impossible," ^' 



51. 1. 13 & 15 read for canedayi " cassedayi." 



53. " 22 read for ambulacria " ambulacra." 



55. "18 " " plicable "plicated." 



55. "35 " " prominent "promising." 



59. " 18 omit comma 

 Explanation to PL II. No. 5 add " enlarged four times." 

 <' f (' " 11 " " in a Codaster." 



" " PI. IV. " 6 read for pyramidalis "bipyramidalls." 



greater degree of certainty than has been the case hereto- 



* Presented by tit,le to The Academy of Science of St. Louis, June 3, I90I. 



t So is, for example, the figure of Granatocrinus melonoides on PI. IX.^ 

 Vol. V. of the Illinois Geological Survey absolutely a false representation 

 of this species although it was drawn by the eminent palaeontologist 

 Meek. * ' 



(1) 



