184 



FICI7S. 



youn 



F. sagitiafa, Vahl. Enum. ii. 185. 1 have seen do specimen of this; it is probably founded on 



shoot of F. ramentacea, Boxb., or F. vilhsa, BL 



w 



F. sarmentosa, Herb. Ham. No. 4533C in Wall. Cat. = F scandens. Boxb. 



F. sclerocoma, Miq. PL Jungh. 58 ; FL Ind. Bat. i. pt. 2. 302. Except the type specimen at Utrecht 



o 



which consists of two separate leaves and two separate receptacles, I have seen nothing bearin 

 this name. Miquel himself says that it is near scabrella, Boxb.; and the fragments which 

 form the type bear this out. F scabrella, Boxb., itself is in my opinion only a form of F. heterophylla, 

 Linn. fii. 



F. rubra, ? Yahl, Blume in Bijdr. 453. I have seen no specimen of this. Doubtless it has been described 



under some other name. Blume's description is too brief for identification. F. rubra, Lamk., is 

 an African plant. 



Covellia rufescem, Kurz, is apparently F. Vrieseana, Miq. 



F. serpyllifolia, Bl. Bijdr. 443, is founded on a fragment of some creeping species. 



F. simplichsima, Lour. FL Cochin China ii. 821 ; Miq. iu Lond. Journ. Bot. I have not seen any specimen 



with this name. 



F. stipulata (not of Thunbg ), Wall. Cat. 4574 = F. punctata, Thunbg. 



F. stipulosa, Miq. Ann. Mus. Lusrd. Bat. iii. 287 ; Urostig. stipulosum, Miq. Lond. Journ. Bot. vi. 568. A 



species founded on Cuming's Philippine specimens (No. 1978), which I should unhesitatingly refer 



to F. infectoria, Boxb 



r 



p. 63) 



F. stupenda, Miq. Ann. Mus. Lugd Bat. iii. 286.— Urost. gigantenm, Miq. in Zoll. Syst. Verz. 90, 96 ; FL 



Ind. Bat. i. pt. 2. 351. This species is founded on Zollinger's Herbarium specimen No. 1676, which 

 he says he collected from a very large tree growing at the base of the Salak mountain, near 

 Buitenzorg, in Java. The type specimen, which is at Utrecht, consists of leaves only. It is named 

 Urostig. gigantenm, Miq. But Miquel himself subsequently changed this to F. stupenda. A young 

 plant under the earlier name is cultivated (1884) in the Botanic Garden at Utrecht It has not 

 produced receptacles, and is not likely to do so. 



F. subcordata, Bl. Bijdr. 440 ; Miq. in Ann. Mus Lugd. Bat. iii. 287 (sub Urostig.) ; Miq. in FL Ind. Bat. 



i. pt. 2. 349. I have seen only one specimen of this at Leiden, and it consists of a few loose 

 leaves, which in nervation and texture resemble those of F. nemorads, Wall., but are broader in shape 

 and net narrowed at the base. 



F sub-cuneata, Miq. in Ann. Mus. Lugd. Bat. iii. 235, 297. This is known only by a few imperfect specimens 



in the Leiden and Calcutta Herbaria, collected in Halmaheira and Ceram. 

 F. sub-pedunculata, Miq Ann. Mus. Lu-d. Bat. iii. 293,—Pogonotrophe Wightiana, Miq. Lond. Journ. Bot. 



vii. 74. Miquel described two plants under the name F. pedunculata. One, a Urostigma, I have 



reduced to F. glabella, Bl. {supra, p. 49). The second Miquel put into his sub-genus Pogonotrophe. 



He says it is Indian, and near F. macrocarpa, Wight, and vagans, Wight ; but 1 have seen no 



specimens, and cannot form an opinion as to what it may be. 

 F. sub-subulata, Miq. Ann. Mus. Lugd. Bat. iii. 225, 292. I have never seen this, there being no specimen in 



the Herbaria at Leiden or Utrecht. From Miquel's description I gather that this is probably a small 



form of F. subulata, Bl. 

 F. suborna, Ham. MSS. = F. elastica, Boxb. 

 F. subrepanda, Wall. Cat. 4568. Sheet B is probably referable to F. infectoria, Boxb. Sheet A (supra, p. 20) 



F» mysoreusis, Heyne, var. sab-repanda. 

 F. superstifiosa, Link, (name only), said by Miquel to be F. religiosa, Linn. 

 F. symphyti ifolia, Lamk.. probably = F. hispida, Linn. fil. 



F. Tabing, Miq. FL Ind. Bat. Suppl. 430, from Sumatra is described from imperfect materials. 

 F. Tampang, Miq. FL Ind. Bat. Suppl. 173, 425 ; Ann. Mus. Lugd. Bat. 290. This is a species of Artocarpus, 



as the young fruit on Miquel's type specimen at Utrecht clearly shows. (See Ann. Bot. Grard 



Calc. ii 8, 15.) 

 F tenax, Bl. Bijdr. 440. Described imperfectly by Blume as an introduction from China : probably 



F. pumila, Linn. 

 F. terminates, Both. 1 have seen no specimens. Miquel reduces doubtfully to F. Altimeraloo, Boxb., which 



F. gibbvsuj BL, var. etispidijera. 



