110 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 179 



e. Angular point fragment, form unknown (13JH201-6). 



Depth : 0.0-0.5 foot below surface of lane. 

 /. Body fragment, large (triangular?) blade (13JH201-10). 



Depth: 0.0-0.5 foot below surface, Feature 1. 

 g. Fragmentary, small leaf -shaped blade (13JH201-15). 



Depth : 0.5-1.0 foot below surface, Feature 6. Plate 23, g. 



2. Fragmentary, large, crudely chipped, leaf-shaped blade (13JH201-7). Plate 



24, i. 



Depth : 0.5-1.0 foot below surface, lane. 



3. Thumb or end scraper, tongue-shaped body, obtuse triangular base, abruptly 



beveled scraping edge (13JH201-5). Plate 24, e. 

 Length : 31.0 mm. 

 Width : 33.0 mm. 

 Thickness : 8.0 mm. 



Cross section : Biconvex ; plano-convex. 

 Technique : Percussion, well controlled. 

 Depth : 0.0-0.5 foot below surface, lane. 



4. Irregular flakes with retouched edges (sample: 3). 



Depth : 0.5-1.0 foot below surface. Features 1, 6, and 7. 



5. Spall chopper or celt, fragmentary poll, flaring bit, roughly beveled chopping 



edge (1SJH201-8). Plate 25, b. 



Length : 71.0 mm. 



Width : 68.0 mm. 



Thickness : 23.5 mm. 



Cross section : Plano-convex. 



Technique : Ground. 



Depth : Unknown, Feature 1. 



6. Earapat collection. Only a brief field examination was possible. The follow- 



ing typological groupings are present : 

 a. Stemless points. 



(1) Leaf-shaped blade (sample: 1). 



(2) Large points of pentagonal shape (sample: 3). 



(3) Elongate points with truncated leaf -shaped body and concave base 



(sample: 5). 

 6. Stemmed points. 



(1) Convex triangular body, abrupt shoulder, expanding stem, convex 



base (sample: 5). 



(2) Convex triangular body, deep side notches, convex base (sample: 4). 



(3) Triangular body, deep corner notches, expanding stem, concave 



base (sample: 4). 



(4) Triangular body, abrupt shoulder, contracting stem (sample: 2). 



ANALYSIS 



Site 13JH201 has produced no evidence of pottery. Since excava- 

 tions were limited, however, and since surface collection in the stock 

 lane was highly casual, the site cannot be labeled unequivocally as 

 nonpottery or prepottery in orientation. If the totality of excavated 

 and surface-collected materials is considered, it is evident that large 

 stemmed points are in the majority. They fall readily into the 

 heterogeneous type 1, the "so-called T^''oodland type" of the Illinois 

 Valley (Cole and Deuel, 1937, pp. 53, 55). Exact horizonal affilia- 



