Hoyme and Bass] 



SKELETAL REMAINS 



367 



Table 7. — Long hones of TolUfero and Clarlcsville males, compared with those 

 from other Southeastern sites 



« Snow, 1948, p. 455 IT. 



» Newman and Snow, 1942, p. 4-38 (Lu 25 S. M. series.) 

 s Newman and Snow, 1942, p. 438 (Lu 92 series). 

 * HrdliCka, 1916. 



'Bicondylar length; all other lengths maximum. 

 8 See footnote 2, table 5. 



graphically. The few crania from Maryland and Virginia (Hrdlicka, 

 1927), Georgia and Florida (Hrdlicka, 1922, 1940) are both remote 

 geographically, and of unknown archeological horizon. Appropriate 

 late series are equally rare: There were few measurable skulls from 

 the Peachtree site in western North Carolina (Stewart, 1941) ; and 

 the late Alabama (Newman and Snow, 1942) and Munsee (Hrdlicka, 

 1916) skeletal series are both small in number and geographically 

 remote. Consequently, little in the way of comparison is either justi- 

 fied or possible. 



With due allowance for these disadvantages, the Tollifero crania 

 seem to fit in fairly well with the earlier Southeastern series, being 

 intermediate in size between the Indian Knoll and Alabama Shell 

 Mound Series, and corresponding fairly well to both in indices (cf. 



568192—62- 



-25 



