﻿INDIANA. 75 



Hamilton County, 



Burial mound a little west of the village of Strawtown. 

 Circular erabaukment aud ditch, about 150 yards southeast of the 

 above, with open gateway on one side. 



Described iu Geol. Sarv. Ind., 1«78, p. 128, and Geol. Surv. Ind., 1834, pp. 28, 

 29. 



Harrison County. 



Mound containing" human bones, flint chips, and pottery, 1 mile be- 

 low the village of New Amsterdam and immediately below the mouth 

 of Indian Creek. 



Large shell mound, half a mile down the river from the above. 



Meutioued, with brief descriptions, iu Geol. Surv. Ind., 1878, pp. 41'J-42r{. 



Henry County. 



Mounds aud inclosure near New Castle. 



Reported by Josbna Holland, Sm. Rep., 1879, p. 4:i8. 



Huntington County. 



Two mounds on the Salamonie Kiver, opposite Warren, in the south- 

 east corner of the county. Partially examined. 

 E. T. Cos, Geol. Surv. Ind., 1875, pp. llW, 131. 



Jackson County. 



Large mound in the northeast corner of the county, on Section 33, a 

 little northeast of Rockford. 



Mounds on the east side of the east fork of White River; one, half 

 mile from Mahan's Ferry, and one 2 miles south of Medora. 



Four mounds on the top of a ridge near Sparksville, in the southwest 

 corner of the county. 



E. T. Cox, Geol. Surv. Ind., 1874, pp. 61-63. 



Mound at Charlestown (?). Examined. 



Foster's Preb. Rac, p. 223. 



Jasper County. 



Mound on the east side of the Iroquois River, near Rensselaer, the 

 county seat. Contained bones and shells. 



Noticed by Prof. John Collett, Geol. Surv. Ind., 1872, p. 299. 



Jay County. 



Group of five small mounds in Section 35, Penn Township, and 

 another of three similar mounds in Section 13, Knox Township. Ex- 

 amined by Dr. Arthur, of Portland. 



Ancient burying ground near the Salamonie, south of Portland, in 

 Section 28, Wayiie Township. Seventeen skeletons were found here. 



Deposit of aslies, charcoal, and broken pottery in a gravel pit just 

 south of Portland. 



Gful. Surv. Ind., 1882, pp. 167-169. 



