Mr. M. Burr — Xofes on the Forficukria. 251 



6. Brachylahis hifoveolata, Bol. 



Brachylabis hifoveolata, Bol. Aun. Soc. Ent. Fr. 1897, p. 285, pi. x. 

 fig.l. 



Bolivar's description is brief but good, and so is his figure. 

 It differs from B. caudelli, the other Asiatic species, in its 

 nniforni reddish legs, in the more strongly convergent 

 keels of the mesonotum, and in the absence of the glandular 

 folds in the third abdominal segment. 



7. Brachylahis caudelli, sp. n. 



Antennae nigra?, ante apicem pallido-annulatas, segmento 3 duplo 

 longius quam latius, 5 quam 3 a^que longo, fere cylindricis ; pro- 

 notum subquadratum, haud vel vix longins quam latius ; meso- 

 notum carinis acutis leviter arcuatis ; femora basi nigra, ajiice 

 pallida ; tibiae fuscae, apice pallidiores ; forcipis braccliia J basi 

 haud coutigua. S $ . 



Small; colour, texture, form, and pubescence typical; 

 antenna with 15 segments, with a pale ring before the apex ; 

 segments rather long, third is about twice as long as broad, 

 fourth more than half as long as thirds fifth quite as long as 

 third, if not a trifle longer ; body almost cylindrical ; meso- 

 notum with the keels gently bowed at the shoulder and 

 gently converging posteriorly ; femora black, yellow at the 

 apex; tibia? brownish yellow, paler towards the apex; tarsi 

 paler ; abdomen typical, third and fourth segments with 

 strong lateral tubercles ; forceps stout at the base, not con- 

 tiguous in the male, contiguous in the female, rapidly 

 tapering, gently arched. 



Burma, Tenasserim, and Pegu {Borm.). 



Apparently common in Further India. This species was 

 confused by de Bormans with B. punctata, which is now- 

 proved to be generically distinct; but there is, of course, a 

 strong family likeness throughout the Brachylabidge. It is 

 most like B. voeltzkowi in appearance. 



8. '^ Brachylahis geniculata, Montr. 



Chelidura geniculata, Montrousier, Ann. Soc. L. Lyon, (n. s.) xi. p. 222 



(1864). 

 Brachylabis getiimlata, Borm. Tierreich, Forf. p. 51 (1900). 



Montrousier's description is insufficient, but de Bormans 



