Seakeeptng Constderattons in a Total Destgn Methodology 
OEFINE THE PROBLEM OBJECTIVE 
TRANSLATE THE PROBLEM OBJECTIVE INTO A DESIGN CRITERION AND INTO PERFORM— 
ANCE CRITERIA. IOENTIFY THE APPROPRIATE INDICES AND THEIR CONSTRAINTS. 
DIVIDE THE PROBLEM INTO SUBPROBLEMS 
I 
SUBPROBLEM | ===> sabia Tih 2 <=> SUBPROBLEM N 
t DEFINE THE SUBPROBLEM OBJECTIVES 
. . 
dae. ! Bee 
. SUBPROBLEM SUBPROBLEM + 
= OBJECTIVE |! SUBPROBLEM|/ OBJECTIVE 2 OBJECTIVE N , 
. . e . 
. . ° . 
. . TRANSLATE THE SUBPROBLEM OBJECTIVE . . 
INTO A DESIGN CRITERION ANO INTO PER-— Z ¥ 
© . FORMANCE CRITERIA. IOENTIFY THE 
. . APPROPRIATE INDICES ANO THEIR CONSTRAINTS. . . 
ey era de tions Napa 
T ITERATION 
bo * 1 GENERATE THE ALTERNATIVES TO BE INVESTIGATED 
ie i To atetawtialale: Tel a leat cal 
ELIMINATE ALL INFEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES 
—~ 
| 
] 
i 
| 
4 
. . 2ND ITERATION | . . 
1 
: 
| 
= 
| 
| 
| 
! 
EVALUATE THE CONSEQUENCES OF SELECTING A 
2 PARTICULAR SUBPROBLEM OBJECTIVE. 
a . 
= IDENTIFY THE DESIRED SUBPROBLEM OBJECTIVE © 
. ANO THE MAC*O LEVEL DESCRIPTION OF THE . 
SYSTEM THAY FULFILLS IT. 
: | 7 
ea Ce Pe ree CY ey error, Cee wer 
INTEGRATE (INTO A SYSTEM 
Figure 1 Exploration phase flow diagram 
r5gt 
