28 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Buuu. 44 
Clnnasss sree. dei sete Orozco y Berra gives this name in his list and refers to Chihua- 
hua, but does not mention it under thisheading. However, 
he gives (1:325), asapparently near the Toboso, the following: 
Sisimbre, Chizo, Cocoyome, Coclama, Tocho, Chizo, Babo, 
and Nure.* It is probable, as the name Chizos is repeated, 
one should be Chiros, the change being a misprint. Ban- 
croft (1, 610), in copying the list, omits one Chizos and 
does not give the name Chiros at any place. No further 
mention of it has been found. 
(ult: ae ina eee a No information regarding this supposed tribe has been found 
other than that given under the last preceding name. 
GalteCOs 22220 oss. cat See Husorones, below. 
Hehmmticass. .- 0.5544 Given as belonging to the Faraon Apache. (Given as a syn- 
onym of Kotsoteka, in Handbook of American Indians, 
pt..J; 728.) 
Parnonen ss <2. <<. ee A division or tribe of the Apache. 
Gecmiehes=: 22-5 s223. In southern California; synonym of Shoshonean Kawia. (See 
Handbook of American Indians, pt. 1, 665.) 
Genicuiches’.. >... 622 Synonym of Serranos. (See Handbook of American Indians, 
pt. 2, 513.) 
(GUEROS ho score Synonym of Gila Apache, New Mexico. (See Handbook of 
American Indians, pt. 1, 492.) 
Prioles =. +2222. sc) Mentioned by Orozco y Berra (1:279) as in Jalisco near the 
Tepecano. No additional information found. Possibly a 
synonym of Huichol. 
E20 tc a age ee Orozco y Berra gives this name in his list and refers to Sinaloa, 
but it is not mentioned under that head. It is probably a 
synonym of Guazave as Ribas (211), to whom he refers on 
the page on which he mentions Guazave, gives “‘Gozaua.’”! 
Guaicamaoépas....-..-- This name is given in Orozco y Berra’s list with reference to 
Sonora, but is not found under that heading; however, 
it is in his classification, under ‘‘ Yuma” (1:59). It is 
probably a synonym of Yacum, a Dieguejfio tribe, California. 
(See Handbook of American Indians, pt. 2, 982.) 
Guailopos: 2.5 2.225: .. Orozco y Berra gives this name in his list, and in his text 
(1:324). He says, ‘“‘En San Andres Chinipas vivian los 
Chinipas, 4 que se agregaron los Guailopos y Maguiaquis,”’ 
referring in a note to ‘‘Cuarta serie de documentos [Doc. 
Hist. Mex.], tomo III, pag. 386 ysiguientes.’’ In the latter, 
the only reference found (387) approximating the state- 
ment in the text is that in the Partido de Santa Inés de 
Chinipa the language is called ‘“‘Chinipa o Guaropaque.”’ 
No San Andrés Chinipa is mentioned, but a ‘‘San Andrés 
de Conicari’”’ (384) is given. Orozco y Berra (1: 326) places 
the language in question under, and asincluded in, Varohio, 
as he does also Maguiaquis. As it is not given a place in 
his list of languages, it may be eliminated. 
Guazarachis. ......... This name is given by Orozco y Berra in his list with reference 
to Chihuahua. It isnot found under that head, but is given 
(1:386) asa Faraon division. The Handbook of American 
Indians (pt. 1. 511) refers to Guazarachic as a Tarahumare 
1 Orozco y Berra’s references at this point (1:333) are erroneous, owing probably to typographical 
error. Note 3, ‘‘ dg. 211,’’ following ‘‘2 Cuarta Serie,” etc., should be ‘‘ Ribas,” and ‘‘4” and ‘‘5,”’ referring 
to Ribas, properly refer to Doc. Hist. Mex., 4th ser., Im, 
