34 
Cajuenches 
Chinagrras 4s 22.5 2he 
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY ; [puLL. 44 
classes Tehue with Eudeve, but without considering it 
a distinct idiom, as he does not include it in his list of 
languages. 
After giving an extract from Francisco Garcés, Orozco y 
Berra (1: 350) says this may appear at first not to correspond 
with what he (Orozco y Berra) has said, as according to it 
the nations dwelling along the Colorado river, beginning 
at the mouth, were the Cucapa, Jallicuamay, Cajuenche, 
Jalchedun, and Jamajab, where he had placed the Quiqui- 
mas, Cuhanas, and Yumas. He claims, however, that the 
contradiction will’ disappear when we consider that the 
Cuhanes and Cucapas were one and the same tribe and 
that the others are nothing more than families [bands?] 
derived from the pueblos speaking Pima. As it is clear 
from Garcés’ Diario that the Cajuenche were north of the 
Cocopa and were Yuman, they should be considered as 
belonging to the United States. 
According to Orozco y Berra (1: 325), the Chinarra, or Huma, 
occupied the pueblo of Santa Ana, in Chihuahua. This, he 
states, was situated to the southeast of the Tarahumare ter- 
ritory, apparently in the southern part of the area he has 
assigned to the Concho on his map. Arlegui (110) brings 
them into relation with the Concho, who, he says, anciently 
inhabited a large areaand many pueblos, some of which were 
occupied subsequently by the Tarahumare. Then follows 
the list of other ‘‘naciones” of this region—Tobosos, 
Chizos, Cocoyames, Acoclames, Julimes, Tapacolmes, Chi- 
narras, etc. Orozco y Berra, probably on the authority of 
Hervas as given below, says the Chinarras spoke a Mexican 
dialect (‘‘dialecto Mexicano’’). Hervas (312) says that the 
missionary Rafael Palacios informed him (in a letter) that 
the Cinarras dwelt about 28 leagues north of the Conchos; 
that while they spoke Spanish, yet he had heard them 
speaking together a language which to his ear appeared to be 
Mexican. They informed him that they were derived from 
the Conchos. It would seem from this that they lived near 
the international boundary line. 
Coras (of Lower Cali- This name has been applied to a subtribe of the Waicuri, 
fornia). 
and is mentioned here merely to call attention to the dis- 
tinction to be made between it and the well-known tribe 
of the same name in the state of Jalisco, discussed in the 
first part of these notes. 
Cumupas, Buasdabas. Same reference and remark as under Bapispes, above. 
Himeris (Hymeris)... Alegre (11, 343) says the Hymeri were a ‘‘nacion”’ situated in 
Mediotaguei 
the various valleys formed by the Sierra Madre northwest 
of the valley of Sonora—that is to say, in the Opata country. 
According to Ribas, they were ferocious, holding friendship 
with no other people, from which fact Hervas (337) 
thinks it probable they spoke a dialect distinct from that of 
the Opatas, though they were related to that people. 
Orozco y Berra (1:58) classes them with the Opata without 
idiomatic distinction. 
Same remark as for Tahue. 
santana Salil mpl 
in oe, 2 
