COLLAPSE OF TEXAS TOWER NO. 4 Al 
Committee conclusion—TVhe decision not to replace tower No. 4 
with a structure performing a like function raises serious doubt as to 
whether tower No. 4 was indeed an operational requirement of the 
service at the time of its collapse. 
The continued need for maintaining the operation of towers Nos. 
2 and 3 is a decision calling for the exercise of military judgment, a 
decision over which the subcommittee is not superimposing its own 
judgment. 
O 
