52 MARINE SCIENCE 
2. A monitoring program requires continuous on continual observation at 
a relatively few number of observation points. 
The question of how much of each kind of research should be included in the 
program (both in time and space) was left to the next meeting. 
It was noted that the development of a cooperative study is good because each 
group can lend support to the program. It was further noted, however, that, in 
the final analysis, individuals will utilize the data. 
It was agreed that, when the committee develops a proposed program, this 
should first be done without regard to cost of the program. 
The establishment of an electronic navigational aid system, such as one of the 
English systems, was recommended for the area of interest. Successful estab- 
lishment by NASA of satellites as a navigation system was considered to be 
doubtful for several years. Because of the vital need for a good navigation 
system, the recommendation is to be considered separate from the development 
of a proposed program of study. 
HpwaArpD D. BENNETT, Secretary. 
ADDRESSES OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS 
Dr. R. S. Arthur,’ Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, Calif. 
Mr. E. B. Bennett, Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, ¢/o Seripps Insti- 
tution of Oceanography, La Jolla, Calif. 
Prof. J. B. Bjerknes, Department of Meteorology, University of California, Los 
Angeles, Calif. 
Dr. W. M. Chapman, The Resources Committee, 1 Tuna Lane, San Diego, Calif. 
Capt. C. N. G. Hendrix, U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office, Washington, D.C. 
Prof. J. D. Isaacs,’ Seripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, Calif. 
Mr. G. W. Kalstrom, Forecast Center, U.S. Weather Bureau, Los Angeles Inter- 
national Airport, Los Angeles, Calif. 
Dr. E. C. LaFond, U.S. Navy Electronics Laboratory, San Diego, Calif. 
Dr. M. B. Schaefer,’ Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, c/o Scripps In- 
stitution of Oceanography, La Jolla, Calif. 
Dr. H. B. Stewart, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Department of Commerce, 
Washington, D.C. 
Commander P. M. Wolff, Project NANWEP, U.S. Navy Postgraduate School, 
Monterey, Calif. 
Mr. G. V. Howard, chairman, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Post Office Box 
6121, Point Loma Station, San Diego, Calif. 
APPENDIX 2—CHAPMAN STATEMENT 
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY, 
_ La Jolla, Calif., February 28, 1961. 
Re new CALCOFT program: 
Marine Research Committee: 
The attached second draft of an expanded CALCOFI program is herewith sub- 
mitted to you for consideration. We do not regard it as complete, but we do 
feel that it embraces many of our most pressing needs. 
Three notes of caution are in order. One refers to costs. These have been 
made as realistic as possible, but clearly cannot be regarded as final working 
budgets. The second refers to space. We have assumed that space is, or will 
be, available, but cannot certify that this is so. 
Finally, and this cannot be overly emphasized, we cannot certify that our 
parent organizations would be willing to accept these new responsibilities even if 
you approve them and find the money. There has simply not been enough time 
to carry all of the new projects through the elaborate policy and guidance 
mechanisms 6f the various organizations. We do certify all of them to you as 
sound, desirable, and scientifically feasible. 
Sincerely, 
GaRrTH I. MurpHy, Chairman, CALCOFI Committee. 
1 Joint alternates from SIO. 
2 Alternate for Mr. E. B. Bennett (IATTC). 
