89 



Article G0(5) 



Whether l.hc words "as recommended by" should bo deleted in 

 order to conform the text to other similar provisions aflr.ctinu 

 freedom of navigation in the Dratt Convention. 



Article 63(2) . 



Whether this paragraph should be harmonized with article 117 

 with respect to the duty to cooperate in taking measures to con- 

 serve living resources beyond and adjacent to the exclusive economic 

 zone. 



Article 73 (1). 



Whether this paragraph 'should refer to natural resources, 

 v;hcther living or non-living. 



Article 85 



Whether this article (copied from the 1958 Convention, which 

 contained the exploitability criterion) should be omitted from the 

 new Convention in light of the provisions regarding the exclusive 

 economic zone, the continental shelf and the Area. 



Article 208 (3) ' . ■ 



Whether the specific environmental obligations of the. coastal 

 State (in respect of its territorial sea, exclusive economic zone 

 and continental shelf) under- this paragraph should be expressly 

 stated to arise only from international rules and standards • that 

 arc generally accepted (see arts. 94(5), 211(2), etc.). 



Article 210(G) 



(Same general point as with respect to art. 208(3).) 



Article 221 ... 



Whether this article should be amended to make the point that 

 the words "beyond the territorial sea" do not affect the right 

 of a State to take measures in its territorial sea. 



Article 233 



Whether this article should state that it is withe. t prejudice 

 to article 38 (3) . 



Part XII 



Whether a provision should bo added applying Sections 5,G, and 

 7 to archipelagic waters. 



