39 
Dr. Froscu. Both. One comment with regard to this particular arms 
control proposal is that it is not clear to me whether the particular 
kind of weapon that would fit in this prohibited class might not be 
more attractive from an arms control and world peace point of view 
than other classes of weapons which would likely be developed in the 
absence of this possibility. 
The use of weapons at sea, at least has a possibility that the weapons 
and the weapon platforms (considered as targets) are well away from 
human population. Whether that becomes more of a consideration or 
less of a consideration as we move in the direction of arms control (or 
possibly move away from it) is not clear at this point, and I think it 
needs considerable additional study. 
With regard to the matter of inspection, you will recall that the diffi- 
culty in most of the inspection discussions in the matter of nuclear 
arms control has been only with the unwillingness of the Soviets to al- 
low inspection, but also with a number of technical questions that had 
to do with the feasibility of detection, and the feasibility of knowing 
where and what to inspect. And I think certainly with our present 
technology, there would be some considerable difficulties in this realm 
as Well, particularly with defensive systems. 
U.S. NAVY CONTRIBUTION IN FIELD OF OCEANOLOGY 
Senator Preiy. Another question here of general interest: Am I cor- 
‘ect in saying that the Navy makes an input of more than 50 percent 
of the total moneys spent by the U.S. Government in the field of 
oceanology ? 
Dr. Froscu. That is correct. 
Senator Pati. About what percentage; 60? 
Dr. Froscu. it is around 50. It may be as high as 60. It depends a 
little bit on the definition you use. 
Senator Prty. Right. £ wish you luck with your conference and I 
trust you will be organizing an interface between private industry and 
the Government uses of it, and look forward to the lead the Navy De- 
partment will be taking in this matter. 
Dr. Froscu. Thank you. 
Senator Priu. Do you have any reaction as to whether your oppo- 
site numbers in the Kremlin, in the Soviet Government, have a similar 
view with regard to the development of arms control measures in the 
ocean depths? 
Mr. Warne. I am afraid I couldn’t speculate about that, Senator. 
Senator Petr. That is all, Mr. Chairman. Thank you very much. 
Senator SparkMAN. Thank you very much, gentlemen. 
Mr. Warnke. Thank you. 
Senator Sparkman. Next we will have Mr. Clark Eichelberger of 
the Commission to Study the Organization of Peace. 
Mr. Eichelberger, we are glad to have you with us again. 
STATEMENT OF CLARK EICHELBERGER, COMMISSION TO STUDY 
THE ORGANIZATION OF PEACE 
Mr. Ercrerpercer. I am delighted to be here. The Commission to 
Study the Organization of Peace was organized in 1939 to consider 
what would take the place of the League of Nations. We have been 
