84 BOOK IV. 



on such veins are not all measured by one method. For in some places the 

 Bergmeister gives them shapes similar to the shapes of the meers on venae 

 pro/midae, in which case the head-meer is composed of three double 

 measures, and the area of every other mine of two measures, as I have 



who work dumps of scoria, etc., and provides for payment to the administrator of the mines 

 of a capitation on the slaves employed. It does not, however, so far as we can determine, 

 throw any light upon the actual regulations for working the mines. (Those interested will 

 find ample detail in Jacques Flach, " La Table de Bronze d' Alpisirel : Notivelle Revue Hisiori- 

 que de Droit Francais cl Elr anger, x%']'ii, p. 655 ; Estacio da Veiga, Memorias da Acad. Real 

 das Ciencias de Lisbon, Nova Scrie, Tome V, Part II, Lisbon, 1S82.) Despite the systematic 

 law of property evolved by the Romans, the codes contain but small reference to mines, and this 

 in itself is indirect evidence of the concept that they were the property of the State. Any 

 general freedom of the metals would have given rise to a more extensive body of law. There 

 are, of course, the well-known sections in the Justinian and Theodosian Codes, but the former 

 in the main bears on the collection of the tithe and the stimulation of mining by ordering 

 migrant miners to return to their own hearths. There is also some intangible prohibition 

 of mming near edifices. There is in the Theodosian code evident extension of individual 

 right to mine or quarry, and this " freeing " of the mines was later considerably extended. 

 The Empire was, however, then on the decline ; and no doubt it was hoped to stimulate the 

 taxable commodities. There is nothing very tangible as to the position of the landlord with 

 regard to minerals found on his property ; the metals were probably of insufficient frequency 

 on the land of Italian landlords to matter much, and the attitude toward subject races was 

 not usually such as to require an extensive body of law. 



In the chaos of the Middle Ages, Europe was governed by hundreds of potentates, 

 great and small, who were unanimous on one point, and this that the minerals vvere their 

 property. In the bickerings among themselves, the stronger did not hesitate to interpret 

 the Roman la a' in affirming regalian rights as an excuse to dispossess the weaker. The rights 

 to the mines form no small part of the differences between these Potentates and the more 

 important of their subjects ; and with the gradual accretion of power into a few hands, we find 

 only the most powerful of vassals able to resist such encroachment. However, as to what 

 position the landlord or miner held in these rights, we have little indication until about the 

 begianing of the 13th century, after which there appear several well-known charters, which 

 as time went on were elaborated into practical codes of mining law. The earliest of these 

 charters are those of the Bishop of Trent, 1185 ; that of the Harz Miners. 1219 ; of the town 

 of Iglau in 1249. Many such in connection with other districts appear throughout the 13th, 

 14th, and 15th centuries. (References to the most important of such charters may be found 

 in Sternberg, Umri^se der Geschichte des Bergbaiies, Prague, 1838 ; Eisenhart, De Regali 

 Metalli Fodinarittm, Helmestadt, 1681 ; Gmelin, Beytrdge zur Geschichte des Teutschen 

 Bergbaus, Halle, 1783 ; Inama-Strenegg, Deutsche Wirthschaftsgeschichte, Leipzig, 1879- 

 1901 ; Transactions, Royal Geol. Soc. Cornwall vi, 155 ; Lewis, The Stannaries, New 

 York 1908.) By this time a number of mining communities had grown up, and the charters 

 in the main are a confirmation to them of certain privileges ; they contain, nevertheless, rigor- 

 ous reservation of the regalian right. The landlord, where present, was usually granted some 

 interest in the mine, but had to yield to the miner free entry. The miner was simply a 

 sort of tributer to the Crown, loaded with an obligation when upon private lands to pay a 

 further portion of his profits to the landlord. He held tenure only during strenuous opera- 

 tion. However, it being necessary to attract skilled men, they were granted many civil 

 privileges not general to the people ; and from many of the principal mining towns " free 

 cities " were created, possessing a measure of self-government. There appear in the Iglau 

 charter of 1249 the first symptoms of the " apex " form of title, this being the logical 

 development of the conception that the minerals were of quite distinct ownership from 

 the land. The law, as outlined by Agricola, is much the same as set out in the Iglavian 

 Charter of three centuries before, and we must believe that such fully developed conceptions 

 as that charter conveys were but the confirmation of customs developed over generations. 



In France the landlord managed to maintain a stronger position vis-a-vis with the 

 Crown, despite much assertion of its rights ; and as a result, while the landlord admitted the 

 right to a tithe for the Crown, he maintained the actual possession, and the boundaries were 

 defined with the land. 



In England the law varied with special mining communities, such as Cornwall, Devon, 

 the Forest of Dean, the Forest of Mendip, Alston Moor, and the High Peak, and they exhibit 

 a curious comple.x of individual growth, of profound interest to the student of the growth 

 of institutions. These communities were of very ancient origin, some of them at least pre- 

 Roman ; but we are, except for the reference in Pliny, practically without any idea of their 

 legal doings until after the Norman occupation (1066 a.d.). The genius of these conquerors 

 for systematic government soon led them to inquire into the doings of these communities, 

 and while gradually systematising their customs into law, they lost no occasion to assert the 



