2 
3 
11 
9 
and 
Whether a feasible @r eErudent alternative exists tc the 
ocean cumping of Material: 
''(A) A prudent and feasible alternative exists if 
the probable adverse impact of utilizing alternative 
ocean locations or land-based locations and methods of 
disposal and recycling is less than or equal to the 
impact of the dumping. 
‘“(B). A EEUdenE and feasible elterrative exists if 
an alternative location or method of dissosal cr 
Sleyelliag 15 AWeblealle, Ele slic MwisisCVvenenes Cie tee irelelGs 
in process tecnnolegy or in overall waste treatment, at 
tCeassnadle cest and energy expenditures. The cest anc 
energy expenditures for any such alternative lecation cr 
disposal, recycling, or imprcvement need not be 
Sompecieivel with) the cecsus\ oz Cccsr GUuTpiine in cedes te 
Se deemed reasonable. 
Du(G) inher tact that senemcceanecunelnamcr sche 
Material may cost less, or de less aifiicult to 
implement, than 2n alternative means c* dispcsel is net 
reason, in itselzi, for aetermining that tne alternative 
means is neither: srucent nor feasible. 
(3})) SWeSseeriiom (Se) wS euiekiceed ice igeel as xselilenss 
**(c)(1) The Raministrator shall agesignate sites at 
which materials may be AtmeSe URORE Eermits issuec under 
this section ana section i193; except tnat no site may ce 
designeted by the Administrates uncer this suosection until 
ua} 
ry 
mM 
ct 
(1) 
71) 
nN) 
J 
0 
jo) 
00) 
be 
'< 
” 
K 
1) 
O 
th 
the Administratoc undertakes and ccm 
the environmental effects which will likely tesult fre: 
dumping. In undertakine such 2n anéelysis cf F2ch site, the 
(1) 
ny 
100) 
ct 
ke 
Oo 
=) 
ve 
=) 
mM 
(9) 
im) 
le 
ct 
(D 
ry 
hk 
joy) 
” 
(1) 
ct 
take into consia 
{y 
he 
bo 
Administrator sh 
