98 
Associations. January 16, 1964. Washington, Housing and Home Finance 
Agency, 1964. 9 p. 
Hichler, Edward P. “Why New Communities.”” In Frieden, Bernard J. and 
William W. Nash, Jr., editors, Shaping An Urban Future; essays in memory of 
Catherine Bauer Wurster. Cambridge, M.I.T. Press, 1969. p. 95-113. 
This essay concentrates on certain California postwar new towns as promo- 
tional phenomena not superior to sprawl development, dismissing the new 
towns movement as rather irrelevant for complex social and economic patterns. 
Eichler, Edward P. and Marshall Kaplan. The Community Builders. Berkeley, 
University of California Press, 1967. 182 p. 
A comprehensive and often critical analysis of large-scale and new community 
development, with emphasis on the California experience in the mid 1960’s, 
Columbia, Maryland, and Reston, Virginia. 
Eldredge, H. Wentworth, editor. Taming Megalopolis. New York, Anchor Books, 
1967. 2 v. 
Volume 2, titled: How to Manage An Urbanized World, contains a chapter on 
“The New Towns Concept,” with articles by— 
Osborn, Frederic J. “Britain’s Place in Town Planning,” p. 819-822. 
Eldredge, H. Wentworth. ‘‘Lessons To Be Learned From The British 
New Town Program.” p. 823-837. 
Gutheim, Frederick. “Continental Europe Offers New Town Builders 
Experience.”’ p. 823-837. 
Rouse, James W. ‘‘The City of Columbia, Maryland. p. 838-848. 
Abrams, Charles. A Land Development Program for California. p. 848-854. 
Rubel, John H. ‘‘The Aerospace Project Approach Applied to Building 
New Cities.”’ p. 854-874. 
Evans, Henry K. “Transportation Planning Criteria for New Towns.” In Highway 
Research Board, Planned Communities. Washington, D.C., National Academy 
of Sciences-National Research Council. 1965. p. 30-50. 
Steps taken in highway traffic planning with special reference to Mountain 
Park and Irvine Ranch in California. 
Fitch, Lyle C. ‘“‘National Development and National Policy.’ In Ewald, William 
R., Jr., editor, Environment and Policy: The Nest Fifty Years. Bloomington, 
Indiana University Press, 1968. p. 283-318. 
A portion of this chapter, p. 304-309, examines the major urban concentra- 
tions of the U.S. The conclusion is that, considering the high projected costs of 
new cities, they are unlikely to be built on a scale that would significantly alter 
the projected pattern of urban settlement. 
Foer, Albert A. “Democracy In The New Towns: The Limits Of Private Govern- 
ment.” University of Chicago Law Review. Winter 1969. p. 379-412. 
A study of the home owners’ associations of Reston and Columbia as 
models for other communities. Examination of pertinent court decisions, 
suggesting that home owners’ associations, using real property as a basis for 
political participation, may violate constitutional equal protection clauses. 
Freeman, Orville L. ‘Towards A National Policy On Balanced Communities.” 
Minnesota Law Review. June 1969. p. 1163-1178. 
Suggestions for the establishment of a development bank for financing 
nonprofit new community development corporations with issuances of 
obligations guaranteed by the Federal government; building of twelve new 
towns in Appalachia is advocated. 
Gelaniey, yanan: “Black New Towns.” Progressive Architecture. August 1968. 
p- —Lol. 
A proposal for new towns for Negroes to shape an environment that they 
would control. 
Gans, Herbert J. The Levittowners: Way of Life and Politics in a New York Sub- 
urban Community. New York, Pantheon Press, 1967. 474 p. 
A survey of the residents of Willingboro, New Jersey, disclosing their 
satisfaction with their living environment. 
CD Hoyt. New Towns. Editoria? Research Reports. November 1968. p. 805- 
_A survey of the new towns movement in Europe and the U.S.A., with brief 
discussion of several U.S. projects. Some of the most recent new town ideas, 
such as the Minnesota Experimental City Project, are cited. 
Gladstone, Robert M. ‘Does Building A City Make Economic Sense?” Appraisal 
ee a 1966. p. 407-412. (Also in Savings Bank Journal. October 1966 
p. 33-37). 
