100 
Katz, Albert M. ‘Lower Rent Costs: A Net Social Gain through Creation of 
New Towns.” Land Economics. May 1968. p. 233-275. 
A model is presented to contrast rent costs between a new community and 
a conventional major urban area. 
Keegan, John E. and William Rutzick. ‘Private Developers and The New Com- 
munities Act of 1968.’’ Georgetown Law Journal. June 1969. p. 1019-1058. 
An analysis of the Federal financial guarantee program for private developers. 
Some discussion of the role of State and local government and the balance 
¢ low and moderate income housing requirement of the New Communities 
ct. 
Krooth, David L. “A Program for New Towns in America.’ In Housing Year- 
book 1966. Washington, D.C., National Housing Conference, 1966. p. 27-30. 
Suggestions on the Federal role and requirements for a new towns program. 
Lalli, Frank. ““New Towns: Are they just Oversized Subdivisions—with Oversized 
Problems?” House & Home. June 1966. p. 93-103. 
A pessimistic view of four projects in the United States: Clear Lake City, El 
Dorado Hills, Reston and Columbia. Diagrams of master plans are included. 
“Land-Financing Idea Stirs Doubts.” Engineering News-Record. February 4, 
1964. p. 45-46. 
A discussion of land loans for State development agencies, proposed in the 
Administration’s housing bill for 1964. 
Lillibridge, Robert M. “Urban Size: An Assessment.’ Land Economics. November 
1952. p. 341-352. 
The issue of optimum city size is traced from the garden city movement 
through the greenbelt towns, Levittown, Park Forest, Oak Ridge, and others. 
Lynch, Kevin. “The Possible City.’? In Ewald, William R., Jr., editor, Environ- 
ment and Policy: The Next Fifty Years. Bloomington, Indiana, Indiana Univer- 
sity Press, 1968. p. 1387-166. 
In this chapter on the changing metropolis, some innovations are listed as 
possible for experimental communities. Whole new cities, however, are thought 
to be more feasible outside the U.S. 
McDade, Thomas. ‘‘New Communities in America.’”? Urban Land. News and 
Trends. January 1965. p. 6-8. 
Three major elements are cited to facilitate new communities as proposed by 
the President in his message to the Congress: Urban Planning Assistance Grants, 
Public Facilities Loans, and FHA insured private mortgage loans for land 
acquisition and development. 
Mandelker, David R. “Some Policy Considerations in the Drafting of New Towns 
Legislation,” Washington University Law Quarterly, February 1965. 
Discusses the relation between new town development and land-use problem, 
emphasizing the need for strong controls on site selection by government. The 
author wants to see new towns constructed only as a facet in a comprehensive 
land policy. 
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission. Development 
Corporations. November 1968. 62 p. 
The necessity of some kind of land development corporation as a vehicle 
for planning and building new towns is asserted. The experience with such 
corporations in Hurope, Canada, and America is detailed and possible alterna- 
tives for use in the region around Washington, D.C., are pointed out. 
Mayer, Albert. “The Role of Regional Policy.” Architectural Record. September 
1964. p. 197-205. 
Examples of regional planning with new towns in several countries. Elements 
for an American policy. 
Mayer, Albert. ‘“‘The Urgent Need for New Towns.” In Housing Yearbook 1967. 
Washington, D.C., National Housing Conference, 1967. p. 35-36. 
An outline of the key elements considered needed to achieve economically 
and socially balanced new communities in America. 
Meyers, Carol S. Taxation and Development: The Use of Tax Policies for Preserving 
Open Space and Improving Development Patterns in the Bi-County Region. Pre- 
pared for the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, 
November 1968. 82 p. 
Present and alternative tax policies in Maryland studied as a means to 
determine the role of tax policy in development. 
Mullarkey, Mary J. “The Evolution of a New Community: Problems of Govern- 
ment.” Harvard Journal of Legislation. May 1969. p. 462-495. 
An evaluation of the Federal atomic energy and greenbelt town projects, 
leading to a discussion of problems of implementing home rule in Federally 
