ON Tin; THEORV OF THE STKAM-ESGINK. 



569 



!au flora : 

 ^Vith 

 between 

 ich comt? 



On ilw Theory of the Steom-Enrjutc. 

 Bjl Professor Kor.KiiT If. Thurston. 



[A cotntnunicatioii or: Icrei 1 liy llio (iencnil C>)mmittoc to be priiitoJ /// r.rfriinii among 



the l!('i)urt.s.] 



TiiK following paper is intended to present, in the bi'iefest possible form, 

 an outline of the i^'rowtli of the theory of tlio steam-engine, from its 

 iirst and most primitive form to its most recent and most thoroughly 

 practical development in application. It is not proposed to make this 

 sketch in any sense complete, and it is hardly expe'jted that it can bo 

 critically accurate. It may, however, prove interesting, and may be of 

 real service, it is hoped, as presenting a ilistinct outline of what will, 

 when more completely worked up, prove to be an exceedingly interesting 

 and important detail of the history of applied science. 



A complete history of the development of the theory of the steam- 

 engine would include, Iirst, the history of the mechanical theory of 

 heat ; secondly, the history of the science of thermodynamics, which 

 has been the outgrowth of that thco-y ; thirdly, the history of the appli- 

 cation of the science of heat transformation to the case of the steam- 

 engine ; and fourthly, an account of the completion cf the theory of the 

 steam and other heat-engines by the introduction of the theory of losses 

 by tlic more or less avoidable forms of waste, as distiuguislied from those 

 necessary and unavoidable wastes in(i . ited by the; pui'e theory of ther- 

 modynamics. The first and second . ' "'ese divisions are treated of in 

 works on thermodynamics, and in treaii on physics. The third division 

 is briefly considered, and usually very incompletely, in treatises on the 

 steam-engine; while the last is of too iTcent development to bo the sub- 

 ject of complete treatment, as yet, in any existing works. Tlie principal 

 object of the present paper is simply to collect into a condensed form, 

 and in proper relations, these several branches of the subject, leaving for 

 another time and place that more full and complete account which might, 

 did opportunity offer, be prepared to-day. 



The 'Mechanical Theory of ll(>at,' as is now well understood, existed, 

 as a speculation, from the days of the earliest philosophies. 'I'he contest 

 which raged with such intensity, and sometimes acrimon}^, among specu- 

 lative men of science during the last century was merely a repetition of 

 struggles of which we (intl evidences at intervals throughout the whole 

 period of recorded history. The closing period of this, which proved to 

 he an important, i-evolution in science marked the begirming of the 

 nineteenth century. It was inaugurated by the introduction of ex- 

 perimental investigation directed toward the crucial point of the question 

 at issue. It terminated, about the middle of the oenturj-, with the 

 acceptance of the general results of such experiment by every scientific 

 niun of acknowledpfed standinjj on either side the Atlantic. The 

 doctrme that heat was material, and its transfer a real movement of 

 substance from the source to the receiver of heat, was thus finally com- 

 pletely superseded by the theory, now become an ascertained truth, that 

 heat is a form of energy, and its transformation a change in the location 

 and method of molecular vibration. The dynamical theory of heat was 



