Figure Page 



34. Topography in dynamic meters, 500-m level adjusted to wind-driven geostrophic 



transport, Ekman divergence considered, September 1962. Drag coefficient 

 0.0026: stresses from mean monthly pressures 70 



35. Topography in dynamic meters, 1,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence considered, September 1962. Drag 

 coefficient 0.0026: stresses from mean monthly pressures 71 



36. Topography in dynamic meters, 2,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence considered, September 1962. Drag 

 coefficient 0.0026: stresses from mean monthly pressures 72 



37. Topography in dynamic meters, 4,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence considered, September 1962. Drag 

 coefficient 0.0026; stresses from mean monthly pressures 73 



38. Topography in dynamic meters, 5,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence considered, September 1962. Drag 

 coefficient 0.0026; stresses from mean monthly pressures 74 



39. Topography in dynamic meters, 5,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geostro- 



phic transport, Ekman divergence not considered, September 1962. Drag 

 coefficient 0.0026: meaned stresses from twice-daily reports of pressure 75 



40. Topography in dynamic meters, 2,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence not considered, September 1962. Drag 

 coefficient 0.0012; meaned stresses from twice-daily reports of pressure 76 



41. Topography in dynamic meters, 5,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence not considered, September 1962. Drag 

 coefficient 0.0012; stresses meaned from twice-daily reports of pressure 77 



42. Topography in dynamic meters, 250-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence considered, May 1963. Drag coeffi- 

 cient 0.0026; stresses from mean monthly pressures 78 



43. Topography in dynamic meters, 500-m level adjusted to wind-driven geostrophic 



transport, Ekman divergence considered, May 1963. Drag coefficient 0.0026; 

 stresses from mean monthly pressures '" 



44. Topography in dynamic meters, 1,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence considered, May 1963. Drag coeffi- 

 cient 0.0026: stresses from mean monthly pressures 80 



45. Topography in dynamic meters, 2,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence considered, May 1963. Drag co- 

 efficient 0.0026: stresses from mean monthly pressures 81 



46. Topography in dynamic meters, 4,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence considered, May 1963. Drag co- 

 efficient 0.0026: stresses from mean monthly pressures 82 



47. Topography in dynamic meters, 5,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence considered, May 1963. Drag coeffi- 

 cient 0.0026; stresses from mean monthly pressures 83 



48. Topography in dynamic meters, 5,000-m level adjusted to wind-driven geo- 



strophic transport, Ekman divergence not considered, May 1963. Drag 

 coefficient 0.0026; stresses from mean monthly pressures 84 



49. Topography in dynamic meters, 250-m level adjusted to wind-driven geostrophic 



transport, Ekman divergence considered. May 1963. Drag coefficient 

 0.0012; meaned stresses from twice-daily reports of pressure 85 



50. Topography in dynamic meters, 500-m le el adjusted to wind-driven geostrophic 



transport, Ekman divergence considered, May 1963. Drag coefficient 

 0.0012; meaned stresses from twice-daily reports of pressure 86 



vn 



