124 



FIGURE 6. Comparison of ex- 

 periments with the solution of 

 the integral equations, low- 

 drag body. (a) Boundary layer 

 and wake thickness. 



0.5 0.6 0.7 08 0.9 



1.0 I.I 

 X/. 



1.2 1.3 1.4 2,5 



(«I0') 



(xl02) 



FIGURE 6(b). Planar and axisymmetric momen- 

 tum deficits. 



Asymp. Value 



Integral Method 



Experiment Sj 

 Experimant A2 



0.5 0.6 



1,1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.5 



Asymp Value 



Integral Method 



Experiment H 

 Experiment H 



_l L_ 



FIGURE 6(c). Shape parameter. 



05 0.6 0,7 0,6 0,9 1,0 II 



-rHl- 



1,2 1,3 1,4 2,5 



