1 Then say, "Net hydrocarbon accumulations, if they occur, are 



2 likely to be the result of-- "instead of" due to other sources such 



3 as--" 



4 DR. BOTHNER 



5 DR. GRASSLE 



6 DR. BOTHNER 



7 DR. GRASSLE 



Other discharges? 



Yes. So maybe just "other sources." 



Sure. 



That cleans it up, don't you think? Does that sound 



8 good? Okay. I am going to read the whole paragraph again. 



9 "Hydrocarbon accumulation in surficial sediments from this source 



10 are likely to be undetectable." 



11 DR. KRAEUTER: Why don't you just put from "produced waters?" 



12 DR. GRASSLE: Yes, "from produced waters are likely to be 



13 undetectable. Net hydrocarbon accumulations, if they occur, are likely 



14 to be from other sources." 



15 Then, I guess, in parentheses it should be, "See "i," oil spill. 



16 The first sentence may need a little tidying up. 



17 DR. KRAEUTER: Do you want to get "G" up? Next to that? It is 



18 almost the same thing. I mean, we are still under--! am getting lost 



19 here, but we are talking about produced water. 



20 DR. MACIOLEK: A lot of what is under "G--" 



21 DR. GRASSLE: "--really characterizes produced water. 



22 DR. GRASSLE: "G" should go under page 23. 



23 DR. KRAEUTER: One of the things there--there was a calculation 



24 that I think it was Brad made concerning how much that really was in 



25 terms of a discharge--l ike 1 liter of oil per day or something like 



26 that. 



27 We ought to find that and have it in there, too, so if we are 



28 talking about the general public they can understand, even though there 



29 are 2,000 barrels per day, 600 parts per million came out of--I think it 



30 was about a liter of oil per day was being discharged. That is 



31 important for communicating with the general public. 



32 DR. MACIOLEK: I remember that 1 liter number somewhere. 



33 DR. WRIGHT: That 2,000 barrels referred to total organic carbon 



34 in the water. 



393 



