1 DR. KRAEUTER: We were going to throw that back. 



2 MR. VILD: It is a redundancy. 



3 DR. VALENTINE: Then the next sentence--amounts of what? Produced 



4 water? Are hardly variable? 



5 DR. KRAEUTER: Yes. 



6 DR. BOTHNER: It might even be the discharge or something. 



7 DR. VALENTINE: I mean, you cannot tell whether that is for 



8 organic carbon or what, so "amounts of produced water are highly 



9 variable." 



10 DR. GRASSLE: I think that the editors are probably going to find 



11 also that Jerry's statement is a bit better than this. I mean, we 



12 happen to have two places to work (inaudible) for these few sentences. 



13 (Simultaneous discussion.) 



14 DR. MACIOLEK: Jerry's statement on produced water was on page 21, 



15 just for the reference. 



16 DR. VALENTINE: Here it is. 



17 DR. BOTHNER: 13 pounds per gallon-- 



18 DR. TEAL: 14 pounds per gallon and 42 gallons per barrel. What 



19 I've done is liters, which is about the same. In 2,000 barrels it comes 



20 to 315 tons. 



21 (Simultaneous discussion.) 



22 DR. GRASSLE: All right. 



23 DR. MACIOLEK: Does anybody have a page 25? Is there a page 25? 



24 DR. AURAND: I think that is just a misnumbered page. 



25 DR. GRASSLE: I would suggest that we delete "E" and "F" as well, 



26 because when I come to the last paragraph this is our concluding thing. 



27 The first sentence of the paragraph at the top of 25d is not a complete 



28 sentence, and I think instead of that paragraph we could use what we 



29 edited at the bottom of 25b and top of 25c--instead of that sentence. 



30 Then our main conclusion is "Benthic effects are not expected." 



31 Now, that really should replace "E" and I think "F" as a sort of--I do 



32 not think we need to say anything about it. 



33 DR. KRAEUTER: But those are part of our original list. 



34 DR. MACIOLEK: The third list-- 



395 



