he 



00 



^7.2- 



£6 

 27 2 

 27.a 

 260 

 24 5 245 



I 

 -260- 



26 



eao 



-272 272- 



26 S 28.5 



260 28 5 



260 28 5 



26 28.5 



24 5 



266 27 2 



-29 7- 

 30 3 

 29 7 

 29 7 

 29 7 

 3/5 



'SILL EL -SO.O FT 



SECTION A- A 



VELOCITY OBSERVATIONS AT 

 10 -FT INTERVALS, SURFACE TO BOTTOM 



TEST CONDITIONS 



UPPER POOL ELEVATION 96 FT 



LOWER POOL ELEVATION FT 



note: VELOCTIES ARE EXPRESSED IN PROTOTYPE 



FT PER SEC ELEVATIONS ARE IN PROTOTYPE 

 FEET ELEVATION IS MLW NEWPORT WHICH 

 IS 1.6 FT BELOW MSL. 



SCALES 



BOTTOM VELOCITIES, CENTER LINE 



HORIZONTAL 



VERTICAL 



100 FT 



Fig. 21. Velocities in East Passage navigation opening of 

 plan 35 for maximum hurricane tide head differential, 20- 



knot design hurricane 



UPPER POOL EL f/0.2 FT 



LOWER POOL EL 0.0 FT 



152 173 IS.2 ' 21.5 236 25.5, 

 Ii2\ 152 \ 162 \ 2O.0 I 222\ 245] 25.5 SILL EL -400 



-25.5- 

 25.5 

 26.0 



-26.0- 



I 



260 



-26.5- 

 25 5 

 255 



■ , APPROX BOTTOM OF BAY -70 FT 



^M- 



26.0 25.5 26.0 



24.5 25.5 26.5 25.5 25.5 24.0 24.5 245 25.5 SILL EL -40.0 



BOTTOM VELOCITIES, CENTER LINE 



SECTION A- A 



VELOCITY OBSERVATIONS AT 

 10 -FT INTERVALS. SURFACE TO BOTTOM 



TEST CONDITIONS 

 UPPER POOL ELEVATION 10.2 FT 

 LOWER POOL ELEVATION 0,0 FT 



VELOCITIES ARE EXPRESSED IN 

 PROTOTYPE FT PER SEC ELEVATIONS 

 ARE IN PROTOTYPE FEET ELEVATION 

 IS MLW NEWPORT WHICH IS 

 16 FT BELOW MSL 



HORIZONTAL 

 VERTICAL 



Fig. 22. Velocities in West Passage navigation opening of 

 plan 35 for maximum hurricane tide head differential, 20- 



knot design hurricane 



