1.0- 



.9- 



I .8- 



S .7- 



CD 



° .6- 



a. 



uj .3' 



s» 



= M 



z 

 S .2- 



SHIPBOARD VS. BOOM 



^^^jizv^zr 



SHIPBOARD 



f 



MAX 



D 



±. 



■^ 



■f 



s 



-BOOM 



MAX 0=0.4083 

 CRITICAL 0=0.2404 



26.0 26.2 26.4 26.6 26.8 27.0 27.2 27.4 27.6 27.8 28.0 28.2 28.4 28.6 



1.0- 

 ,- .9- 



OD 



2 .7- 

 £ .6- 



^ 5- 

 « .4- 



i -3- 



5.2- 

 .1- 







SHIPBOARD VS. RAWINSONDE 



SHIPBOARD- 



y 



rr P 



MAX I ' 



.t.J 



RAWINSONDE 



,1 



^ 



.;■ 



MAX 0=0.3654 

 CRITICAL 0=0.2667 



1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 — 



26.0 26.2 26.4 26.6 26.8 27.0 27.2 27.4 27.6 27.8 28.0 28.2 28.4 28.6 



'""I BOOM VS. RAWINSONDE 



.9- 



.7- 

 .6- 



1.5- 

 ? .4- 

 = .3- 



.2- 

 .1- 



RAWINSONDE 



/ \ pplMAX 



^■■Z pv-.- z{- ^'--iJ i M 



i 1 1 1 1~ 



BOOM-l I- 



ip 



BOOM 



MAX D=0.1538 

 CRITICAL 0=0.2667 



I I 1 1 r^ — I 1 1 1 1 1 r 



28.0 26.2 26.4 26.6 26.8 27.0 27.2 27.4 27.6 27.8 28.0 28.2 28.4 28.6 



TEMPERATURE rci 



Figure 15. Cumulative probability oujrves for shipboard-boom, shipboard- 

 rawinsonde, and boom-rawinsonde comparisons for 2000-1059 GMT 

 subgroup for the Rainier when wind is not across the ship 

 toward the boom. The Kotmogorov-Smimov maximum D and the 

 calculated D^ value are indicated. BOMEX Period III, June 19 

 July 2, 1969. 



36 



