BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WOODS HOLE AND VICINITY. i6l 



thus far presented. This contained over 200 species of marine fishes. In several sup- 

 plementary lists and special notes Dr. Smith has amplified this catalogue." 



In 1908 Kendall published a "List of the Pisces" for the "Fauna of New England," 

 series of the Boston Society of Natural History, but few changes or additions were made 

 as regards the fishes of the vicinity of Woods Hole. All this material, together with 

 many new data and a few entirely new records for species, have been summarized in the 

 annotated list included in the present report.'' In the preparation of the latter con- 

 siderable collections of unpublished notes by Mr. Edwards were examined, and he 

 himself was continually questioned throughout the progress of the work. The data 

 contributed by Mr. Edwards were based (i) on records from the fish traps operated by 

 the Bureau of Fisheries in the neighborhood of the Woods Hole station; (2) on records 

 from the fyke nets, which have been set during the fall, winter, and spring in both the 

 harbors of Woods Hole; (3) on the records of innumerable seining trips made at various 

 times of the year, but particularly in the summer months; (4) the collections made by 

 the tow net suspended from the end of the pier (furnishing records of the occurrence of 

 young fishes) ; and (5) from specimens or information received from fishermen through- 

 out all of the local waters. Most of the specimens collected during the dredging opera- 

 tions, and many more which were caught in other ways during this period, were identi- 

 fied by the authors of this report. Those concerning which any doubt was felt were 

 referred to the ichthyologists of the Bureau of Fisheries. To Dr. H. M. Smith and Dr. 

 W. C. Kendall we are indebted for a critical examination of our check list of fishes. 



In our list of species are comprised 2 Marsipobranchii, 26 Selachii, and 2i9(-f 4?) 

 Teleostomi. In our comparative table (p. 89) it will be seen that the fishes have been 

 included in only two of the other faunal catalogues therein considered. Herdman 

 records 134 species for the Irish Sea, i. e., hardly more than half the number comprised 

 in our own catalogue, while Graefife lists 181 species for the Gulf of Trieste. Here, as 

 elsewhere, it would be interesting to know how largely these differences in the number 

 of species are actual and how largely they are due to the thoroughness of the collecting 

 and recording. It must be borne in mind that our own list comprises a large number of 

 species which are not indigenous, being stragglers, whose presence in our waters is due 

 to the proximity of the Gulf Stream. The number of such exotic species is probably 

 peculiarly high in our region. 



Owing to the small number of species taken by the dredge and to the comparative 

 paucity of the records even lor such as were taken, the data thus gained relating to the 

 local distribution of these species have not been very impressive. In general we may say, 

 however, that while some species appeared to have an unrestricted distribution in local 

 waters, many more fishes were taken in Vineyard Sound than in Buzzards Bay; likewise 

 that a number of species occurred wholly or mainly at the western end of the Sound.' 



See bi]>lioBraphic list for the faunal cataloRUe. p. 791. 



bThe records of Cope (1870) for Newport have been included here, although they were not considered by Smith, who limited 

 the "vicinity of Woods Hole" to a somewhat smaller area than the "Woods Hole Region" of the present report. 



c It is liJcely that this latter fact is in a certain measure due to the greater frequency with which the beam trawl was employed 

 upon the sandy bottoms at the western end of Vineyard Sound. This instrument was obviously better adapted to catching and 

 retaining fishes than were the other types of dredge employed. 



16269° — Bull. 31, pt I — 13 II 



