study during the 1978 session and possible passage 
in 1979. 
Guam 
Federal Funding 
Program Preparation (Section 305) 
1974: 
1975: $143,000 
1976: 189,000 
1977: 210,045 
Total: 542,045 
Current Status 
In about 2% years Guam has inventoried all of 
its major resources (including reefs and beaches), 
mapped and classified them, and has used this 
knowledge to provide the basis for a comprehensive 
land and water use program. A land-use element 
designed to take into account significant resources 
and user needs was published and distributed for re- 
view. A major effort has ‘gone into drafting coastal 
legislation. 
Authorities 
In addition to Guam’s Seashore Protection Act 
and territorial statutes, island-wide land-use legis- 
lation has been prepared for adoption by the legisla- 
ture. This legislation consists of districting of land 
(patterned after Hawaii),.the designation of per- 
missible uses in those districts, and a process to 
designate areas of particular concern. 
Hawaii 
Federal Funding 
Program Preparation (Section 305) 
1974: $ 250,000 
1975: 400,000 
1976: 500,000 
1977: 300,000 
Total: 1,450,000 
Estuarine Sanctuary (Section 315) 
1976: $199,600 
1977: 
Total: 199,600 
Current Status 
Throughout the development of its coastal man- 
agement program, Hawaii has followed a classical 
planning approach. It has identified its coastal re- 
sources and the concurrent management problems, 
and has conducted a widespread public involvement 
program that was instrumental in problem identifica- 
tion and the passage of coastal legislation. Differ- 
ences between the State and county governments as 
to the proper division of implementation responsi- 
bilities have been a continuing problem. 
During its fourth year of program development, 
the State has been working on a management pro- 
gram that describes how the State will enforce the 
program’s objectives and policies, both during an 
interim period of time during which local govern- 
ments are to refine the coastal development permit 
boundary and be in compliance with State policies, 
and thereafter. 
Authorities 
The State will use both direct controls (particu- 
larly in coastal waters) and local implementation of 
State-established criteria and standards to control 
land and water uses. The Hawaii Coastal Zone Man- 
agement Act of 1977 establishes State policies, re- 
quires local and State government compliance, re- 
quires developers to acquire a coastal development 
permit, and directs that the Hawaii program use 
other existing State authorities. 
Ilinois 
Federal Funding f 
Program Preparation (Section 305) 
1974: $ 206,000 
O75: 434,000 
1976: 500,000 
I)7/7/8 
Total: 1,140,000 
Current Status 
illinois’ Coastal Zone Management Program is in 
its third year of development within the Illinois De- 
partment of Transportation’s Division of Water 
Resources. 
The inland boundary follows property lot lines or 
transportation right-of-way lines and in either case 
is not more than 500 feet from Lake Michigan. The 
State’s major coastal management policies are to 
minimize shore erosion, flooding, and property dam- 
age; protect water quality; protect offshore reef for- 
mation, coastal fisheries, and natural areas; promote 
shoreline recreation services and promote lake- 
dependent commercial, industrial, navigation, port, 
and energy facilities. The Illinois Coastal Zone Man- 
agement Program has four areas of particular con- 
cern requiring special management attention: (1) the 
Illinois Beach State Park, (2) the Waukegan Harbor 
and lakefront industrial complex (3) the 100-year 
high-risk erosion area of Lake Bluff, and (4) offshore 
dolomite reef formations. 
Authorities 
The Illinois Coastal Resources Management Act 
_ (HB 2118) has been passed by the House of the 
Illinois General Assembly and will be voted on by 
the Senate in the next session. This Act establishes a 
permit system to be administered by either the State 
1V-26 
