Zoological Society. 479 
out of consideration the Echinodermata, in which Johannes 
Miiller’s acuteness everywhere recognized traces of bilateral 
arrangement, such are to be found amongst the Coelenterata, 
for example, in the 12-rayed Philomedusa Vogtii, and in the 
young brood of the equally many-rayed Cunina Kollikeri. The 
radiate structure is exhibited, on the contrary, with the greatest 
strictness in many four-rayed Discophora, and in the biradiate 
Ctenophora, which therefore prove, even in this respect, to be 
true Coelenterata. 
PROCEEDINGS OF LEARNED SOCIETIES. 
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 
January 14, 1862.—Dr. J. E. Gray, F.R.S., V.P., in the Chair. 
DESCRIPTION OF SPHYROCEPHALUS LABROSUS*, A New Barr 
FRoM Oxp CaLABaR River, Western Arrica. By An- 
DREW Murray, Ass. Sec. R. Horricutrurau Society. 
PTEROPINI. 
SPHYROCEPHALUS, nov. gen. 
Dental formulary :— Molars. 
—— a 
Incisors. Canines. Premolars? True molars? 
4 1 1 
= te 4 en —_ 
4 l 2 3 
Head very large and oblong; the lips largely developed and ex- 
panded. Kars rather large, without tragus. Thumb and index-finger 
of hand unguiculate, the other fingers without claws. Tail wanting. 
SPHYROCEPHALUS LABROSUS, Sp. Nov. 
Brown, with a few whitish hairs at the base of the ears. The 
head very large, massive, half as long as the whole body, oblong, 
and as broad at the muzzle as at the top of the head, with some re- 
semblance to a hammer, whence the name hammer-headed (Sphyro- 
cephalus), rather more than twice’as long as deep; ears rather large, 
destitute of tragus; eyes rather large; eyelids provided with eye- 
lashes ; nostrils large and tubular ; lips extraordinarily developed ; 
* Since this paper was in print, the last number of the ‘ Proceedings of the 
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia’ has been received in this country 
(the first copies arrived on 19th February, 1862) ; and in it I find a description of 
a new Bat, which probably belongs to this species, by Dr. Harrison Allen (Proc. 
Acad. Nat. Se. Phil. July 1861, p. 156). It is said to be taken from a specimen 
collected by M. Du Chaillu, and is named by Dr. Allen Hypsignathus monstrosus. 
If it is the same species, of course Dr. Allen’s name must take precedence. His 
description does not quite correspond with mine, but, judging from the description 
of the nose, may, perhaps, have been taken from a dried skin, whereas mine is 
from a fine example in spirits. M. Du Chaillu has exhibited no specimen of this 
Bat in England. 
