74 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL, 72 
Sewa- pile. 32.42, 44.20, 44.23, 48.7, 48.42, 50.1, 60.25, 64.23 
a‘ci- teach. 34.40 
a‘cowi- cross. 34.7, 34.9, 34.11 (twice), 34.16, 40.27, 40.30 (reduced in the last two 
cases). 
a‘cka-, a‘cki- fall. 62.4, 62.7, 62.34 
a‘tci- anew, change, move. 14.12, 44.12, 60.11, 60.12 
attci- tell of. 24.6, 30.35, 36.27, 36.35, 38.3, 38.13, 38.32, 40.1, 48.10, 48.30, 48.31, 
54.23, 60.17, 62.3, 62.15, 62.22, 64.1, 64.15 
A‘tcipanagi'tci- all sorts of ways. 52.12, 60.20 
-Ate- live. 44.35, 44.36, 60.11 
atawa‘d- repeat. 52.19 
ato- relate, speak. 34.41, 56.39, 64.1 
atowa-, dtowi- speak an alien language. 62.38 
a‘so- support. 50.23, 52.15 
Anawi- inability. 32.24, 50.20, 52.11 
anagi- accustomed to. 28.36, 46.34, 46.45, 48.1 
ane‘kiwi- in succession. 54.33 
ane‘kd- lengthen. 30.18 
anwi- disbelieve (with -‘taw- -‘t- instr.). 38.18, 64.37, 64.38 
anemi- overpower. 18.21 
anwi- fail, be unable. 64.42 
-Aniwi-' meaning? last, endure? 46.25 
-apa- see? (derived from wapa; Cree and Ojibwasimilarly). 58.11, 64.28 
-Apa- dawn, derived from wapa-; same ultimately as -Apa- see. 20.34, 46.31, 46.34 
api- untie. 16.32, 32.27, 44.20 (twice). 
-api- see, look at (-Api- after w). 50.30, 52.6, 52.8, 52.10, 58.26 
-apowa- food. 30.34 
-Apyi- extend; with pemi- flow (of water). 49.25 
a‘pa‘wa-, a‘pa‘wi- dream. 36.41 
a‘pe- forever (with -t-, -“tci-).3 20.14, 34.37, 54.34 
a‘pena-, A‘peni- be diseased. 44.30, 52.12, 54.19 
a’pene- alike. 42.24, 58.33 
a‘pi- extent, duration (with -‘t-, -‘tci-).* 16.23, 30.39, 44.44, 46.27, 58.1, 58.21, 58.25, 
58.28, 60.33 
~Ame‘ki- earth.6 42.45, 48.36, 48.37, 56.28 
1 The text in the current syllabary and the text restored phonetically by dictation support the form; 
but from Jones’s Fox Texts at 378.6it would appear that at 46.25 -awinigwénni‘, not -Aniwigwiinsi', should 
beread. The stem then would be -Awi-. 
2 -Apa- after w. ‘ 
3 As I have shown on another occasion, the so-called “intervocalics’”’ are anillusion. What we really 
have are post-verbal extensions. At the present time it is not known under what conditions these are 
used. These ‘‘extensions’”’ run in sets: -t- -4tci-, -‘t- -‘tci-, -n- -‘ci-. Strictly speaking, it is probable 
that the ‘“‘extensions’’ should be given as -t-, -‘t-, -n-, for t ‘t n respectively become 4tc ‘te ‘ce before i which 
is a new morphological element, and -t- -‘t- -n- are used, and not -4tci- -‘tci- ‘ci-, before e in positions where 
i would be converted into e (for example, if the following syllable of a different morphological unit contains 
4), as wellas in cases where iwii becomes owi, and also where an i is lost before -wiwi-. That is to say, 
the -i- is also a morphologicalelement. Insofar as -e-is used to prevent consonantic clusters foreign to the 
Fox language, a certain amount of doubt is thrown on the above reasoning. Theoretically alist of Fox 
verbal stems should show what verbalstems can be combined (for synthesis of stems does not universally 
hold true), and in the case of copulas the sets which go together, what pair of ‘“extensions’’ go with any 
given stem and how they are used, what instrumental particles go with any stem (in some cases several), 
andin what position the stems occur. But an enormous mass of text-material would be needed to show 
this. So far as the writer knows Sauk, Fox, Kickapoo, Cree, and Ojibwa agree entirely as regards these 
points. Hence it may be presumed that at least all Centra] Algonquian languages do. 
4In texts dictated by Harry Lincoln recorded as A‘pi-; the evidence of Cree favors A‘pi- as being the 
original Fox form. (Note A‘pi- at 34.27.) 
5 In another text the same author has used -Ame‘kwi- consistently. 
