262 BULLETIN OF THE BUREAU OF FISHERIES. 
Hiccins, HELEN T. 
1901. The development and comparative structure of the gizzard in the Odonata Zygopteza. 
Proceedings, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, vol. 53, 3d series, pp. 126-141, 
pls. 2-4. Philadelphia. A detailed account of the folds and armature of the gizzard in 
go species of damselflies, nearly all foreign. 
Jounson, Rosert §., and StaPLeTon, M. F. 
1915. Fish ponds on farms. Appendix II, Report, U. S. Commissioner of Fisheries for 1915, pp- 
1-28, 19 pl. Washington. Included water supply, pond construction, value of aquatic 
plants, fishes suitable for pond culture, natural and artificial fish foods, diseases and 
enemies of fish. 
KAMMERER, PAUL. 
1908. Symbiose zwischen Edogontum undulatum and Wasserjungferlarven. Wiener-Festschriften, 
pp. 238-252. Wien. Claimed a real symbiosis between the alga and the nymph, each 
deriving benefit from the presence of the other. 
Ket.icotr, Davip §. 
1899. The Odonata of Ohio. Ohio State Academy of Science, Special Papers, No. 2, 114 pp., 
figs. 1-39. Columbus. An annotated list of Ohio species. 
KENNEDY, CLARENCE H. 
1915. Notes on the life history and ecology of the dragonflies (Odonata) of Washington and Oregon. 
Proceedings, U. S. National Museum, vol. 49, pp. 259-345, 201 text figs. Washington. 
1917. Notes on the life history and ecology of the dragonflies (Odonata) of central California and 
Nevada. Idem, vol. 52, pp. 483-635, 400 text figs. These two papers contain fine 
accounts of Pacific coast dragonflies and damselflies, with full descriptions and excellent 
illustrations. 
LAMBORN, Rost. H. 
1890. Dragonflies vs. mosquitoes. 8vo., 202 pp., 9 pl. New York City. Introduction only by 
Dr. Lamborn. The dipterous enemies of man, by Mrs. C. B. Aaron; Utility of dragondies 
as destroyers of mosquitoes, by Archibald C. Weeks; The destruction of the mosquito, 
by Wm. Beutenmuller; Dragonflies as mosquito hawks on the western plains, by Capt. 
C. N. B. Macauley; Can the mosquito be exterminated? by Henry C. McCook, with 
good bibliographies. 
Lucas, W. J. 
1908. Foe of dragonfly nymphs. The Entomologist, vol. 41, p. 16. London. “Mr. O. A. 
Rowden, writing from Exeter (England) on Dec. 16, 1907, says that the water boatman 
(Notonecta glauca) attacks the nymphs of dragonflies.”’ 
Lyon, Mary B. 
1915. The ecology of the dragonfly nymphs of Cascadilla Creek (Odonata). Entomological 
News and Proceedings, Entomological Section, Academy of Natural Sciences of Phila- 
delphia, vol. 26, pp. 1-15, 1 pl., 1 diagram, 3 tables. Philadelphia. Included a census 
of the diatoms, green and blue-green alge, protozoa, etc., which settle on the back of 
odonate nymphs, the food of nymphs, and the efficiency of shelter as protection against 
enemies. 
MarsHALL, Wm. S., and GiLBert, N. C. 
1905. Notes on the food and parasites of some fresh-water fishes from the lakes at Madison, Wis. 
Appendix, Report, U. S. Commissioner of Fisheries for 1904 (1905), pp. 513-522. Wash- 
ington. Odonate nymphs were found in the stomachs of 9 yellow perch. 
MartTIN, RENE. 
1886. Les Odonates du département de l’indre. Revue d’Entomologie, vol. 5, pp. 231-251. 
Caen. 
McAtrE, W. L., and Brat, F. E. L. 
1912. Some common game, aquatic and rapacious birds in relation to man. U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Farmers’ Bulletin No. 497, 30 pp., 14 text figs. Washington. Mentioned as 
eating dragonfly imagos the killdeer plover, the common tern, and the black tern, and as 
eating dragonfly nymphs, the homed grebe, and Franklin’s gull; 327 nymphs were taken 
from the stomach of a single gull. 
