BOAS] 



HANDBOOK OF AMERICAN INDIAN LANGUAGES 



619 



Present, Visible 



qiqo'cta qiqo'ta qiqo'ctac 



On the whole, these doubled forms are iised more frequently in a 



predicative sense than the single forms. Apparently they are often 



substantival forms, but I think they are better characterized as 



predicative. Quite often these forms may be translated this one, 



WHO. 



x'ix'e'Tc ahge'tli'^Lam x'iza zqleyd'qxot it is this (masc), he brought 

 it (masc.) this (neut.) old man 67.6 



dqlo'xoL xaxau' d'hxat Oq.'o'xdL, this is the one, she has come 

 down to the beach 107.9 (o- she; -lx to the beach; -t perfect) 



X'ix'iau amiga't'.dm this one whom you met 185.12 (a- transi- 

 tional; m- thou; i- him; -gatq to meet; -om completive) 



anid'uia^ qiqiau' x JctcEnxgd'luJcL I killed that one who always went 

 first 89.5 {~wa^ to kill; qiqiau' x probably for qiqiau' ; Tc- the one 

 who; tcEU — he me; -xgako to go about; -l with suffix -alco by 

 metathesis -oIuTcl) 



The simple forms occur generally in adjectival form. 



naPe'ma xalc oklu'ltcin I will give her this fish head 183.7 (nal- 



I her to her; -^em to give food; -a future; oklu'ltcin fish hesid) 

 atciLE'Pem iJcamo'kxulc qo'za Lge'wusx he gave a bone to that dog 



187.12 {atcihEl- he him to it; ikamb'hxuh bone; Lge'wusx dog) 

 k^ca'la x'lk ne'mal up this river 220.2 



In some cases I have found tike, tik, hik instead of the same elements 

 with the prefix x'i, but I am not certain whether in these cases the 

 beginning of the word was not slurred over. 



§44 



