BOAS] 



HANDBOOK OF AMERICAN INDIAN LANGUAGES 



829 



of these differences can be seen from a comparison of a few participles 

 with their related conjunctives: 



d'JiAnemihdHc^ when he went yon way 



Sine'miJid^t'^ he who went yon way 



Si'nemihd' tcig^ they who went yon way 



a'-M^mi/iamiga'ki^n' they (the stones) that went yon waj?' 

 d'^'pe'TneTcd'^tc^ when he passed by 



pa,' me' Jed'' f^ he who passed by 



d'Tivdci'td' when he came from thence 



w'iitcli^ he who came from thence 



wa^cfmiga'ki^n* they (the things) that came from thence 

 d'lci'witd^tc^ when he staid around them 



fci2yi'^atci^g' they who staid about them 



JciwVtdmigSi'ki^ni they (the things) that remained about 



phmineJca'watcig^ they that chase 70 title (stem-vowel e) 

 m&lcaddwit^ he who was fasting 186 title (stem-vowel a) 

 manwdneteig^ he who preferred it 136.5 (stem-vowel e) [ending 



-a^« for -Ag^'—T. M.] 

 wkpinlgwdt^ the white-eyed one 150.1 (stem-vowel d) 

 ^apdnAt^ the one whom you love 150.1 (stem-vowel e) 

 wknimdi^ the one whom he had forsaken 150.7 (stem-vowel i) 

 n&sdt^ he that slew him 26.13, 17 (stem-vowel e) 

 tca,gdndtowdtcig^ they of every language 22.14 (tcdg for tcdgi 



[§16]) 

 ml'^6matcig they who had been making love to her 46.5 {mi'Tc- 



[§16]; -^-[§8]; -m- [§ 21]) 



The transitive pronominal forms differ most widely where the third 

 person is involved in the subject. The transitive participle of the 

 third person sometimes has the force of a possessive construction 

 combined with that of an objective. Its sense is then more of the 

 nature of a noun. Its pronominal endings are slightly different, as 

 can be seen from the table. 



These forms occur in situations like these : 



tclnawd'msitci^n.^ his relative; viz., one to whom he is related 

 (-m- [§ 21]) 



§ 33 



