836 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 40 



dsakahAmsiwdwdff^ when they burn him for them title 380 

 {d—a>catc'[§ 29]) 



JcetecinatutQxnbn^ such is what I ask of thee 380.5 (graphic variant 

 for ketAcmAtutkvuon^ ; he — n^ [§ 28]; tAci- initial stem mean- 

 inj^ number) 



tniicinAtutAvaxxJx'^ is what they beg of thee 382.14 (for In'- a.'ici-', 

 m' [§47]; d—¥ [§29]; ici thus) 



m^Amaw/w" tell them to me 350.19 (the stem is wit- [or loi-', -t- as 

 in §8 ?];-/;.«[§ 31]) 



kewltxn\on I told it to you 114.22 (for ke — n^ [§ 28] by contrac- 

 tion [§ 8]) 



kmntA.um.v!dw°' thou wilt tell it to him 178.1 {kl — dw°' [§ 28]) 



divlfAmondn^ I tell it to thee 314.1 {d — iid7i' [§ 29]) 



kluHtenioue-ind^ go ahead and tell it to me 112.15 (kl — ne [§ 28]; 

 -('w^o- variant of -A?nd-) 



kiuutemofiejnca 1 will tell it to 3^ou (pi.) 356.6 (kl — iiejuca [§ 28]) 



wt'i'clwitBxn.bnAgbio^ what I should tell you (pi.) 280.13 {iifl — 

 nAgow^ [§ 29]; iel- initial stem thus; -hdio- variant of -Amo-) 



dirdwltAmaw iijAfi^ when thou tauntedst me about him 330.16 

 {d—i(/An'[§ 29]; wd-[l 25]) 



m?<;*i(Amaw /ya(7^ what we (excl.) would you (sing.) declare to us 

 364.20 {ii-i-^iydif [§ 29]) 



dklciwltAuibndii^ I have nothing more to say to thee 330.13 {d—ndn 

 [§ 29]; klci- an initial stem denoting completion [§ 16]; an ex- 

 cellent example to show that klci- in Algonquian is not (as 

 is assumed in some purely practical grammars) merely a tense- 

 prefix to form the perfect) 



klwlfAmawi-ted)}ief/^ I should merely like j'ou to tell it to me 

 328.14 {kl—i [I 28] ) 



I do not understand aioitAmeg'^ untAva.bne7iAgd^°' i ought not to 

 HAVE TOLD Tou 314.2. It is clear that ^Mf/a''* belongs in § 30; -ahio- 

 also needs no elucidation. The -ne- is a puzzle; I wonder if it stands 

 for -ni- and is the same as the negative suffix -ni in § 29? 



According to Dr. Jones, d' kete/m7iAma.w ii/dgtv^ 374.14 (and similarly 

 tndcindkaketem{nAm?i\fiydgic^ 374.9) means, not in that tou have 

 BLESSED them FOR MY SAKE, — which the analysis would require, — but 



in that tou have DONE THE BLESSING FOR ME. 



tolvnt AmAs<} Age ^ at 350.17 is clear enough in structure {ic'i — Age^ 

 [§§ 29, 35]), but certainly does not fit well with Dr. Jones's explana- 

 tion (Fox Texts, p. 351, footnote 3). I suspect that the real sense is i 



MEANT TO HAVE TOLD (yOU) ABOUT THEM FOR HIS SAKE. 



This -Amaw- is also to be seen in indefinite passives, conjunctive 

 mode [§ 41]. Examples are: 

 §34 



