434 
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY 
[bull. 73 
Figures and estimates for the Natchez who settled among the 
Creeks have been given in a separate publication. 1 
In addition, a word may be said regarding those Shawnee who for 
a time constituted part of the confederacy. In 1708 the South 
Carolina documents give three Shawnee towns in that colony and 150 
men; 2 in the census of 1715 three towns with 67 men, and 233 souls. 3 
In 1760 there were 100 Shawnee men in the bands among the Creeks. 4 
In 1761 the united Shawnee on Tallapoosa River were estimated to 
have 30 hunters, 5 but Marbury (1792) raises this to 60 (p. 436). 
Hawkins does not give any figures, and the name Shawnee does not 
occur in the ceaisus list of 1832, but we find a town called "Kiamulga- 
town" which appears elsewhere coupled with the Shawnee and may 
have been occupied by them. It had a population of 175. 6 
The following table contains the population of all the above towns 
as well as the remaining towns of the confederacy, so far as they are 
known, drawn from the Spanish, French, and English trading lists of 
1738, 1750, 1760, and 1761, as given by Taitt, Marbury, and Hawkins, 
and in the census of 1832. 
Comparative Town Census 
Town. 
Spanish 
census 
of 1738 
(men). 
French 
census 
of 1750 
(men). 
Census 
of 1760 I 
(men). 
Census 
of 1761 s 
(hunt- 
ers). 
Taitt, 
1772 
(gun- 
men). 
Mar- 
bury, 
1792 
(men). 
Haw- 
kins, 
1799 9 
(gun- 
men). 
u. s. 
census 
of 1832 'o 
(souls). 
26 
132 
+ 80 
150 
130 
220 
60 
100 
280 
896 
438 
111 
+ 80 
150 
50 
50 
160 
30 
50 
100 
50 
375 
300 
50 
(14) 
180 
11 250 
1,918 
Yuchi 
1,139 
Osochi 
12 120 
60 
30 
13 20 
+20 
15 
539 
1 120 I 
427 
40 
Hitchiti 
90 
381 
i Bull. 43, Bur. Amer. Ethn. I may add that Taitt says there were 30 gunmen, "Natches and Creeks," 
in the Natchez town among the Upper Creeks in 1772 (Mereness, Trav. Am. Col., p. 532), and Marbury 
places the figure at 110 in 1792 (p. 436). 
2 S. C. Pub. Docs., MS., v, pp. 207-209. 
3 Rivers, Chap. Early Hist. S. C, p. 96. 
* Miss. Prov. Arch., I, p. 96. 
6 Ga. Col. Rec, vra, p. 523. 
e Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., IV, pp. 302-303. 
7 Miss. Prov. Arch., i, pp. 94-96. 
s Ga. Col. Docs., vm, pp. 522-524. 
s Ga. Hist. Soc. Colls., in, pp. 26-66. 
i° Sen. Doc. 512, 23d Cong., 1st sess., iv, pp. 239-394. My figures often differ from those given in the docu 
ment because it was found that many errors in compilation had been made. 
11 Native estimate. 
'2 Including 3 towns. 
i3"Cina." 
i* With Apalachicola. 
