MR. F. CURREY ON SPHARLA. 257 
0:0009 inch long, uni- or bi-seriate, mostly the former. This is, no doubt, the perfect 
state of the species, the Kew specimen being only imperfectly developed. 
306. S. (HENDERSONIA) HIRTA, Fr.! S. M. ii. p. 483. From the Scleromycetes Sueciæ, 
no. 17. 
307. S. SEMIIMMERSA, Grev. ! 
308. S. OCELLATA, Fr.! S. M. ii. p. 480. From the Scleromycetes Sueciæ, no. 187. 
309. S. roMICUM, Lev. Ann. des Sc. Nat. 1848. From Desmazière’s Fl. Cr. de France, 
no. 1776 ! 
310. 8. CONFORMIS, Berk. & Br.! Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 2. vol. ix. p. 326, pl. xi. 
fig. 19. 
311. S. (HALONIA) DITOPA, Fr. S. M. ii. 381. Drawn from a specimen given to me by 
Mr. Broome. The one in the Hookerian herbarium, from the Scleromycetes Suecire, 
no. 84, has no fruit. Tulasne (S. F. Carp. ii. p. 145) makes 5. ditopa a myriasporous 
form of S. suffusa, Fr. I cannot understand this, for no two things could be more 
unlike one another in fructification. 
312. S. QUADRINUCLEATA, Curr. ! 
313. S. RUBI, Curr. ! 
314. 8. INQUILINA, Wallr. ; Fr. EL ii. p. 100. Named from specimens taken from my own 
herbarium. This species ought perhaps to be with the Caulicolæ rather than the 
Obtectæ. Fries (Adnotata) remarks, “ Sph. inquilina Fr., nec Wallr., qui hanc inno- 
minatam misit. Equidem semper sincere citavi primos specierum determinatores." 
315. S. acus, Blox. MS. ! 
316. S. PHOMATOSPORA, Berk. & Br.! Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 2. vol. ix. p. 380, pl xi. 
fig. 33. 
317. 8. Arcus, Berk. & Br.! Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 2. vol. ix. p. 322, pl. x: 
fig. 9 
918. §, APICULATA, Curr! 
319. 8. APPENDICULOSA, Berk. & Br.! Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 2. vol. vii. p. 189. 
320. 8. sıparra, Berk. & Br.! Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 2. vol. ix. p. 321, pl. ix. fig. 8. 
321. 8. (Massarra) AMBLYOSPORA, Berk. & Br.! 7. c. p. 322, pl. x. fig. 10. 
322. 8. GIGASPORA, Desm. ! 
323. S. INQUINANS, Tode; Fr. S. M. ii. p.486. Figured from specimens in my herbarium 
collected near Blackheath in March 1856. There is much confusion about S. in- 
Quinans, Tode. The only specimen in the Kew herbarium is from the Scleromycetes 
Sueciæ, no. 394, and is certainly the same thing as S. amblyospora, B.& Br: Tulasn 
(in the S. F. Carp. vol. ii. p. 236, under Massaria Bulliardi) makes S. inquinans, 
Tode, identical with S. gigaspora, Desm.; but at p. 134 of the same —— he 
identifies it with a plant described by me in the * Microscopical Journal’ (vol. iv. 
1856, p. 198), which is certainly not S. gigaspora. y 
0 
