THE ANNALS 
AND 
MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY, 
[SIXTH SERIES. ] 
No. TVS "OCTOBER, 1897. 
XXXVII.—On the Cteniform Spiders of Ceylon, Burmah, 
and the Indian Archipelago, West and North of Wallace's 
Line; with Bibliography and List of those from Australasia, 
South and East of Wallace’s Line. By F. O. PickarpD 
CAMBRIDGE, B.A. 
[Plate 1V.] 
CONTENTS. 
Page 
(OD MANOA IEC ENON Be. fas ete ovate lanws Spore eS SFL Alaus dabwisleceo 8,4 ohs 0 win ehe 330 
(ii.) a. List of Species noted in the Text, and New Species 
describedpand siowmeds: nasiciic wickese tio cerese scene on ote oe 330 
6. Bibliography relating to the Ctenifurm Spiders of Ceylon, 
fra LIMern ea Ss Coa eRe eederon- bay Menskavs tals cvs eysvaug syne lates « scan ele 351 
(iii.) Geneva and Species of 2-clawed Forms, with Notes on Types 
and Descriptions of New Species .............0.00 332 
(iv.) Genera and Species of 5-clawed Forms, with Notes on Types 
and  Deseriptions ot Now Species isi. lesiex sine ae des 350 
(v.) Bibliography relating to Cteniform Spiders from New Guinea 
BEG EE LSE) Otis POCLES CMP 3! a) or « s/oit ojhe) dls’ woacete hs. 6 354 
Note.—On page 68 Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., Jan. 1897, I have, in the 
short diagnosis there given of the genus Cupiennius, Sim., based on this 
author’s identification of a specimen as C. oculatus, Sim. (= Crenus Salei, 
Keys.), stated that the tarsal claws are two. This is not correct; there 
are three distinct tarsal claws, but the large claw-tuft on each side renders 
it very difficult to detect the inferior claw. Cuprennius Salei apparently 
comes yery close to my genus Lycoctenus, from which it is distinct, how- 
ever, amongst other characters by the absence of spines beneath the tarsi 
and by the presence of the large claw-tufts. 
92 
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 6. Vol. xx. 23 
