﻿powell.] 
  LINGUISTIC 
  MAP. 
  25 
  

  

  of 
  the 
  stocks 
  there 
  considered, 
  and, 
  as 
  the 
  title 
  indicates, 
  treats 
  also 
  

   of 
  the 
  Pueblo 
  languages. 
  The 
  families 
  mentioned 
  are: 
  

  

  1. 
  Chimariko. 
  G. 
  Takilrna. 
  

  

  2. 
  Washo. 
  7. 
  Rio 
  Grande 
  Pueblo. 
  

  

  3. 
  Yakona. 
  8. 
  Kera. 
  

  

  4. 
  Sayuskla. 
  9. 
  Zufii. 
  

  

  5. 
  Kiisa. 
  

  

  1883. 
  Hale 
  (Horatio). 
  

  

  Indian 
  migrations, 
  as 
  evidenced 
  by 
  language. 
  In 
  The 
  American 
  Antiquarian 
  

   and 
  Oriental 
  Journal. 
  Chicago, 
  1883, 
  vol. 
  5. 
  

  

  In 
  connection 
  with 
  the 
  object 
  of 
  this 
  paper 
  — 
  the 
  study 
  of 
  Indian 
  

   migrations— 
  several 
  linguistic 
  stocks 
  are 
  mentioned, 
  and 
  the 
  lin- 
  

   guistic 
  affinities 
  of 
  a 
  miniber 
  of 
  tribes 
  are 
  given. 
  The 
  stocks 
  men- 
  

   tioned 
  are 
  : 
  

  

  Huron-Cherokee. 
  Algonkin. 
  

  

  Dakota. 
  Chahta-Muskoki. 
  

  

  L885. 
  Tolmie 
  (W. 
  Fraser) 
  and 
  Dawson 
  (George 
  M.) 
  

  

  Comparative 
  vocabularies 
  of 
  the 
  Indian 
  tribes 
  of 
  British 
  Columbia, 
  with 
  a 
  

  

  map 
  illustrating 
  distribution 
  (Geological 
  and 
  Natural 
  History 
  Survey 
  of 
  

  

  Canada). 
  Montreal, 
  1S84. 
  

  

  The 
  vocabularies 
  presented 
  constitute 
  an 
  important 
  contribution 
  

   to 
  linguistic 
  science. 
  They 
  represent 
  " 
  one 
  or 
  more 
  dialects 
  of 
  every 
  

   Indian 
  language 
  spoken 
  on 
  the 
  Pacific 
  slope 
  from 
  the 
  Columbia 
  

   River 
  north 
  to 
  the 
  Tshilkat 
  River, 
  and 
  beyond, 
  in 
  Alaska; 
  and 
  from 
  

   the 
  outerniQst 
  sea-board 
  to 
  the 
  main 
  continental 
  divide 
  in 
  the 
  Rocky 
  

   Mountains." 
  A 
  colored 
  map 
  shows 
  the 
  area 
  occupied 
  by 
  each 
  lin- 
  

   guistic 
  family. 
  

  

  LINGUISTIC 
  MAP. 
  

  

  In 
  1836 
  Gallatin 
  conferred 
  a 
  great 
  boon 
  upon 
  linguistic 
  students 
  

   by 
  classifying 
  all 
  the 
  existing 
  material 
  relating 
  to 
  this 
  subject. 
  Even 
  

   in 
  the 
  light 
  of 
  the 
  knowledge 
  of 
  the 
  present 
  day 
  his 
  work 
  is 
  found 
  

   to 
  rest 
  upon 
  a 
  sound 
  basis. 
  The 
  material 
  of 
  Gallatin's 
  time, 
  how- 
  

   ever, 
  was 
  too 
  scanty 
  to 
  permit 
  of 
  more 
  than 
  an 
  outline 
  of 
  the 
  subject. 
  

   Later 
  writers 
  have 
  contributed 
  to 
  the 
  work, 
  and 
  the 
  names 
  of 
  

   Latham, 
  Turner. 
  Pilchard, 
  Buschmann, 
  Hale, 
  Gatschet, 
  and 
  others 
  

   are 
  connected 
  with 
  important 
  rlassificatory 
  results. 
  

  

  The 
  writer's 
  interest 
  in 
  linguistic 
  work 
  and 
  the 
  inception 
  of 
  a 
  plan 
  

   for 
  a 
  linguistic 
  classification 
  of 
  Indian 
  languages 
  date 
  back 
  about 
  

   20 
  years, 
  to 
  a 
  time 
  when 
  he 
  was 
  engaged 
  in 
  explorations 
  in 
  the 
  West. 
  

   Being 
  brought 
  into 
  contact 
  with 
  many 
  tribes, 
  it 
  was 
  possible 
  to 
  col- 
  

   lect 
  a 
  large 
  amount 
  of 
  original 
  material. 
  Subsequently, 
  when 
  the 
  

   Bureau 
  of 
  Ethnology 
  was 
  organized, 
  this 
  store 
  was 
  largely 
  increased 
  

   through 
  the 
  labors 
  of 
  others. 
  Since 
  then 
  a 
  very 
  large 
  body 
  of 
  

   literature 
  published 
  in 
  Indian 
  languages 
  has 
  been 
  accumulated, 
  and 
  

   a 
  great 
  number 
  of 
  vocabularies 
  have 
  been 
  gathered 
  by 
  the 
  Bureau 
  

  

  