﻿Auk. 
  

  

  Hunah. 
  

  

  Chilcat. 
  

  

  Kek. 
  

  

  Hanega. 
  

  

  Sitka. 
  

  

  Hoodsunu. 
  

  

  Stahkin 
  

  

  powell.] 
  KULAXAIWX 
  FAMILY. 
  87 
  

  

  sively 
  an 
  insular 
  and 
  coast 
  people, 
  but 
  Mr. 
  Dawson 
  lias 
  made 
  the 
  

   interesting 
  discovery' 
  that 
  the 
  Tagish., 
  a 
  tribe 
  living 
  inland 
  on 
  the 
  

   headwaters 
  of 
  the 
  Lewis 
  River, 
  who 
  have 
  hitherto 
  been 
  supposed 
  

   to 
  be 
  of 
  Athapascan 
  extraction, 
  belong 
  to 
  the 
  Koluschan 
  family. 
  

   This 
  tribe, 
  therefore, 
  has 
  crossed 
  the 
  coast 
  range 
  of 
  mountains, 
  

   which 
  for 
  the 
  most 
  part 
  limits 
  the 
  extension 
  of 
  this 
  people 
  inland 
  

   and 
  confines 
  them 
  to 
  a 
  narrow 
  coast 
  strip, 
  and 
  have 
  gained 
  a 
  perma- 
  

   nent 
  foothold 
  in 
  the 
  interior, 
  where 
  they 
  share 
  the 
  habits 
  of 
  the 
  

   neighboring 
  Athapascan 
  tribes. 
  

  

  TRIBES. 
  

  

  Tagish. 
  

   Taku. 
  

  

  Tongas. 
  

   Yakutat. 
  

  

  Population. 
  — 
  The 
  following 
  figures 
  are 
  from 
  the 
  census 
  of 
  1880.* 
  

   The 
  total 
  population 
  of 
  the 
  tribes 
  of 
  this 
  family, 
  exclusive 
  of 
  the 
  

   Tagish, 
  is 
  6,437, 
  distributed 
  as 
  follows: 
  

  

  Auk 
  640 
  Kek 
  568 
  

  

  Chilcat 
  988 
  Sitka 
  72! 
  

  

  Hanega 
  (including 
  Kouyon 
  aud 
  Stahkin 
  317 
  

  

  Klanak) 
  587 
  Taku 
  269 
  

  

  Hoodsunu 
  666 
  i 
  Tongas 
  273 
  

  

  Hunah 
  908 
  | 
  Yakutat 
  500 
  

  

  KULANAPAN 
  FAMILY. 
  

  

  X 
  Kula-napo. 
  Gibbs 
  in 
  Schoolcraft. 
  Ind. 
  Tribes, 
  m, 
  421. 
  1853 
  (the 
  name 
  of 
  one 
  of 
  

   the 
  Clear 
  Lake 
  bands). 
  

  

  > 
  Mendocino 
  (?), 
  Latham 
  in 
  Trans. 
  Philolog. 
  Soc. 
  Lond.,77, 
  1S56 
  (name 
  suggested 
  

  

  for 
  Choweshak, 
  Batemdaikai, 
  Kulanapo, 
  Yukai. 
  Khwaklamayu 
  languages). 
  

   Latham, 
  Opuscula. 
  343. 
  I860. 
  Latham. 
  El. 
  Com<>. 
  Phil.. 
  410. 
  1862 
  (as 
  above). 
  

  

  > 
  Porno, 
  Powers 
  in 
  Overland 
  Monthly, 
  ix. 
  4!ls, 
  Dec., 
  1872 
  (general 
  description 
  of 
  

  

  habitat 
  and 
  of 
  family). 
  Powers 
  in 
  Cont. 
  N. 
  A. 
  Eth., 
  Ill, 
  146, 
  1877. 
  Powell, 
  ibid., 
  

   491 
  (vocabularies 
  of 
  Gal-li-no-me-ro, 
  Yo-kai 
  -a. 
  Ba-tem-da-kaii, 
  Chau-i-shck, 
  

   Yu-kai, 
  Ku-la-na-po, 
  H'liana. 
  Venaambakaiia, 
  Ka'-bi-na-pek, 
  Chwachamaju). 
  

   Gatschet 
  in 
  Mag. 
  Am. 
  Hist.. 
  16, 
  1877 
  (gives 
  habitat 
  and 
  enumerates 
  tribes 
  of 
  

   family). 
  Gatschet 
  in 
  Beach, 
  Ind. 
  Misc., 
  436, 
  1877. 
  Keane, 
  App. 
  Stanford's 
  

   Comp. 
  (Cent, 
  and 
  So. 
  Am.), 
  476. 
  1878 
  (includes 
  Castel 
  Pomos.Ki, 
  Cahto, 
  Choam, 
  

   Chadela, 
  Matomey 
  Ki, 
  Usal 
  or 
  Calamet, 
  Shebalne 
  Pomos, 
  Gallinomeros, 
  Sanels 
  , 
  

   Socoas, 
  Lamas, 
  Comachos). 
  

  

  < 
  Porno, 
  Bancroft, 
  Nat. 
  Races, 
  m,566, 
  1882 
  (includes 
  Ukiah, 
  Gallinomero, 
  Masatla- 
  

  

  magoon, 
  Gualala, 
  Matole. 
  Kulanapo, 
  Sanel, 
  Yonios, 
  Choweshak, 
  Batemdakaie, 
  

  

  Chocuyem, 
  Olamentke, 
  Kainamare, 
  Chwachamaju. 
  Of 
  these, 
  Chocuyem 
  and 
  

  

  Olamentke 
  are 
  Moquelumnan). 
  

  

  The 
  name 
  applied 
  to 
  this 
  family 
  was 
  first 
  employed 
  by 
  Gibbs 
  in 
  

  

  1853, 
  as 
  above 
  cited. 
  He 
  states 
  that 
  it 
  is 
  the 
  " 
  name 
  of 
  one 
  of 
  the 
  

  

  1 
  Annual 
  Report 
  of 
  the 
  Geological 
  Survey 
  of 
  Canada, 
  1887. 
  

  

  'Petroff. 
  Report 
  on 
  the 
  Population. 
  Industries, 
  and 
  Resources 
  of 
  Alaska. 
  1884, 
  

   p. 
  33. 
  

  

  