﻿92 
  INDIAN 
  LINGUISTIC 
  FAMILIES. 
  

  

  MOQUELUMNAN 
  FAMILY. 
  

  

  >Tcho-ko-yem. 
  Gibbs 
  in 
  Schoolcraft, 
  Ind. 
  Tribes, 
  III, 
  421.1853 
  (mentioned 
  as 
  a 
  

   liancl 
  and 
  dialect). 
  

  

  >Moquelumne, 
  Latham 
  in 
  Trans. 
  Philolog. 
  Soc. 
  Lond., 
  81, 
  1856 
  (includes 
  Hale's 
  

   Talatui, 
  Tuolumne 
  from 
  Schoolcraft, 
  Mumaltachi, 
  Mullateco, 
  Apangasi. 
  La- 
  

   pappu, 
  Siyante 
  or 
  Typoxi, 
  Hawhaw'sband 
  of 
  Aplachea, 
  San 
  Rafael 
  vocabulary, 
  

   Tshokoyem 
  vobabulary, 
  Cocouyem 
  and 
  Yonkiousme 
  Paternosters, 
  Olamentke 
  

   of 
  Kostromitonov, 
  Paternosters 
  for 
  Mission 
  de 
  Santa 
  Clara 
  and 
  the 
  Vallee 
  de 
  

   los 
  Tulares 
  of 
  Mofras, 
  Paternoster 
  of 
  the 
  Langue 
  Guiloco 
  de 
  la 
  Mission 
  de 
  San 
  

   Francisco). 
  Latham. 
  Opuscula, 
  347, 
  1*1)1). 
  Latham, 
  El. 
  Oomp. 
  Phil., 
  414, 
  1862 
  

   (same 
  as 
  above 
  i. 
  

  

  =Meewoc, 
  Powers 
  in 
  Overland 
  Monthly. 
  322, 
  April, 
  1873 
  (general 
  account 
  of 
  family 
  

   with 
  allusions 
  to 
  language). 
  Gatschet 
  in 
  Mag. 
  Am. 
  Hist. 
  , 
  159, 
  1877 
  (gives 
  

   habitat 
  and 
  bands 
  of 
  family). 
  Gatschet 
  in 
  Beach, 
  Ind. 
  Misc., 
  433, 
  1877. 
  

  

  = 
  Mi-\vok, 
  Powers 
  in 
  Cont. 
  N. 
  A. 
  Eth., 
  m, 
  346, 
  1877 
  (nearly 
  as 
  above). 
  

  

  <Mutsun, 
  Powell 
  in 
  Cont. 
  N. 
  A. 
  Eth., 
  in. 
  535, 
  1*77 
  (vocabs. 
  of 
  Mi 
  -wok. 
  Tuolumne, 
  

   ( 
  iostano, 
  Tcho-ko-yeni, 
  Mutsun, 
  Santa 
  Clara, 
  Santa 
  Cruz, 
  Chum-te-ya, 
  Kaweya, 
  

   San 
  Raphael 
  Mission, 
  Talatui. 
  Olamentke). 
  Gatschet 
  in 
  Mag. 
  Am. 
  Hist.. 
  157, 
  

   1*77 
  (gives 
  habitat 
  and 
  members 
  of 
  family). 
  Gatschet, 
  in 
  Beach, 
  Ind. 
  Misc., 
  

   130, 
  1877. 
  

  

  X 
  Runsiens. 
  Keane, 
  App. 
  Stanford's 
  ( 
  !omp. 
  (Cent, 
  and 
  So. 
  Am.), 
  476, 
  1878 
  (includes 
  

   Olhones, 
  Eslenes, 
  Santa 
  Cruz, 
  San 
  Miguel, 
  Lopillamillos, 
  Mipacmacs, 
  Kulana- 
  

   pos, 
  Yolos, 
  Suisunes, 
  Talluches, 
  Chowclas, 
  Waches, 
  Talches. 
  Poowells). 
  

  

  Derivation: 
  From 
  the 
  river 
  and 
  hill 
  of 
  same 
  name 
  in 
  Calaveras 
  

   County, 
  California; 
  according 
  to 
  Powers 
  the 
  Meewoc 
  name 
  for 
  the 
  

   river 
  is 
  Wakalumitoh. 
  

  

  The 
  Talatui 
  mentioned 
  by 
  Hale 
  1 
  as 
  on 
  the 
  Kassima 
  (Cosumnes) 
  

   River 
  belong 
  to 
  the 
  above 
  family. 
  Though 
  this 
  author 
  clearly 
  dis- 
  

   tinguished 
  the 
  language 
  from 
  any 
  others 
  with 
  which 
  he 
  was 
  ac- 
  

   quainted, 
  he 
  nowhere 
  expressed 
  the 
  opinion 
  that 
  it 
  is 
  entitled 
  to 
  

   family 
  rank 
  or 
  gave 
  it 
  a 
  family 
  name. 
  Talatui 
  is 
  mentioned 
  as 
  a 
  

   tribe 
  from 
  which 
  he 
  obtained 
  an 
  incomplete 
  vocabulary. 
  

  

  It 
  was 
  not 
  until 
  1856 
  that 
  the 
  distinctness 
  of 
  the 
  linguistic 
  family 
  

   was 
  fully 
  set 
  forth 
  by 
  Latham. 
  Under 
  the 
  head 
  of 
  Moquelunme, 
  

   this 
  author 
  gathers 
  several 
  vocabularies 
  representing 
  different 
  lan- 
  

   guages 
  and 
  dialects 
  of 
  the 
  same 
  stock. 
  These 
  are 
  the 
  Talatui 
  of 
  

   Hale, 
  the 
  Tuolumne 
  from 
  Schoolcraft, 
  the 
  Sonoma 
  dialects 
  as 
  repre- 
  

   sented 
  by 
  the 
  Tshokoyem 
  vocabulary, 
  the 
  Chocuyem 
  and 
  You- 
  

   kiousme 
  paternosters, 
  and 
  the 
  Olamentke 
  of 
  Kostromitonov 
  in 
  

   Biier's 
  Beitrage. 
  He 
  also 
  places 
  here 
  provisionally 
  the 
  paternosters 
  

   from 
  the 
  Mission 
  de 
  Santa 
  Clara 
  and 
  the 
  Vallee 
  de 
  los 
  Tulares 
  of 
  

   Mofras; 
  also 
  the 
  language 
  Guiloco 
  de 
  la 
  Mission 
  de 
  San 
  Francisco. 
  

   The 
  Costano 
  containing 
  the 
  five 
  tribes 
  of 
  the 
  Mission 
  of 
  Dolores, 
  viz., 
  

   the 
  Ahwastes, 
  Olhones 
  or 
  Costanos 
  of 
  the 
  coast, 
  Romonans, 
  Tulonios 
  

   and 
  the 
  Altahmi 
  is 
  seemed 
  t< 
  > 
  Latham 
  to 
  differ 
  from 
  the 
  Moquelumnan 
  

   language. 
  Concerning 
  them 
  he 
  states 
  " 
  upon 
  the 
  whole, 
  however, 
  the 
  

   affinities 
  seom 
  to 
  run 
  in 
  the 
  direction 
  of 
  the 
  languages 
  of 
  the 
  n^xt 
  

  

  >U. 
  S. 
  Expl. 
  Exp., 
  1846, 
  vol. 
  6, 
  pp. 
  630, 
  033. 
  

  

  