﻿108 
  INDIAN 
  LINGUISTIC 
  FAMILIES. 
  

  

  SHOSHONEAN 
  FAMILY. 
  

  

  >Shoshonees, 
  Gallatin 
  in 
  Trans, 
  and 
  Coll. 
  Am. 
  Antiq. 
  Soc. 
  n, 
  120, 
  133, 
  306, 
  1836 
  

   (Shoshonee 
  or 
  Snake 
  only). 
  Hale 
  in 
  U. 
  S. 
  Expl. 
  Exp., 
  vi, 
  218, 
  1840 
  (Wihinasht, 
  

   Panasht, 
  Yutas, 
  Sampiches, 
  Comanches). 
  Gallatinin 
  Trans. 
  Am. 
  Eth. 
  Soc., 
  II, 
  

   pt. 
  I, 
  c, 
  77, 
  1848 
  (as 
  above). 
  Gallatin, 
  ibid. 
  , 
  18, 
  1848 
  (follows 
  Hale; 
  see 
  below). 
  

   Gallatin 
  in 
  Schoolcraft. 
  Ind. 
  Tribes, 
  in. 
  lo.'. 
  is."*:;. 
  Turner 
  in 
  Pac. 
  R. 
  R. 
  Rep., 
  in. 
  

   l>t. 
  :i. 
  55,71,76, 
  1856 
  (treats 
  only 
  of 
  Comanche, 
  Chemehuevi, 
  Cahuillo). 
  Busch- 
  

   mann, 
  Spuren 
  der 
  aztek. 
  Sprache, 
  552, 
  049, 
  1859. 
  

  

  >Shoshoni. 
  Hale 
  in 
  U.S. 
  Expl. 
  Exp., 
  VI, 
  199, 
  218, 
  569, 
  1846 
  (Shoshoni, 
  Wihinasht, 
  

   Panasht, 
  Yutas, 
  Sampiches, 
  Comanches). 
  Latham 
  in 
  Trans. 
  Philolog. 
  Soc. 
  

   Lond., 
  73,1850. 
  Latham, 
  Opuscula, 
  340, 
  1860. 
  

  

  >Schoschonemi 
  Kamantschen, 
  Berghaus 
  (1845), 
  Physik. 
  Atlas, 
  map 
  17, 
  1848. 
  Ibid., 
  

   1852. 
  

  

  >Shoshones, 
  Prichard, 
  Phys. 
  Hist. 
  Mankind, 
  v, 
  429, 
  1847 
  (or 
  Snakes; 
  both 
  sides 
  

   Rocky 
  Mountains 
  and 
  sources 
  of 
  Missouri). 
  

  

  = 
  Shoshoni,GatschetinMag. 
  Am. 
  Hist. 
  154, 
  1877. 
  Gatschet 
  in 
  Beach, 
  Ind. 
  Misc., 
  426, 
  

   1877. 
  

  

  <Shoshone. 
  Keane, 
  App. 
  Stanford's 
  Comp. 
  (Cent, 
  and 
  So. 
  Am.), 
  460,477.1*78 
  (in- 
  

   cludes 
  Washoes 
  of 
  a 
  distinct 
  family). 
  Bancroft, 
  Nat. 
  Races, 
  III, 
  567, 
  661 
  , 
  1882. 
  

  

  >Snake, 
  Gallatin 
  in 
  Trans, 
  and 
  Coll. 
  Am. 
  Antiq. 
  Soc. 
  II, 
  120, 
  133, 
  1836 
  (or 
  Sho- 
  

   shonees). 
  Hale 
  in 
  U. 
  S. 
  Expl. 
  Exp., 
  vi, 
  218, 
  1846 
  (as 
  under 
  Shoshonee). 
  Prich- 
  

   ard, 
  Phys. 
  Hist. 
  Mankind, 
  v, 
  429, 
  1847 
  (as 
  under 
  Shoshones). 
  Turner 
  in 
  Pac. 
  

   R. 
  R. 
  Rep., 
  in.pt. 
  3. 
  76, 
  1856 
  (as 
  under 
  Shoshonees). 
  Buschmann, 
  Spuren 
  der 
  

   aztek. 
  Sprache, 
  552, 
  649. 
  1859 
  (as 
  under 
  Shoshonees). 
  

  

  <Snake, 
  Keane, 
  App. 
  Stanford's 
  Comp. 
  (Cent, 
  and 
  So. 
  Am.), 
  477, 
  1878 
  (contains 
  

   Washoes 
  in 
  addition 
  to 
  Shoshonean 
  tribes 
  proper). 
  

  

  >Kizh,Hale 
  in 
  U. 
  S. 
  Expl. 
  Exp., 
  vi, 
  569, 
  1846 
  (San 
  Gabriel 
  language 
  only). 
  

  

  >Netela, 
  Hale, 
  ibid., 
  569, 
  1846 
  (San 
  Juan 
  Capestrano 
  language). 
  

  

  >Paduca, 
  Prichard, 
  Phys. 
  Hist. 
  Mankind, 
  v. 
  415, 
  1847 
  (Cumanches, 
  Kiawas, 
  Utas). 
  

   Latham, 
  Nat. 
  Hist. 
  Man, 
  310, 
  326, 
  1850. 
  Latham 
  (1853) 
  in 
  Proc. 
  Philolog. 
  Soc. 
  

   Lond., 
  vi. 
  73, 
  1854 
  (includes 
  Wihinast, 
  Shoshoni, 
  Uta). 
  Latham 
  in 
  Trans. 
  

   Philolog. 
  Soc. 
  Lond., 
  96, 
  1856. 
  Latham, 
  Opuscula, 
  300. 
  300. 
  1860. 
  

  

  <Paduca, 
  Latham, 
  Nat. 
  Hist. 
  Man., 
  346, 
  1850 
  (Wihinast. 
  Bonaks, 
  Diggers, 
  Utahs, 
  

   Sampiches. 
  Shoshonis.Kiaways.Kaskaias?, 
  KenewaysV, 
  Bald-heads, 
  Cumanches, 
  

   Navahoes, 
  Apaches, 
  Carisos). 
  Latham. 
  El. 
  Comp. 
  Phil., 
  440, 
  1862 
  (defines 
  area 
  

   of: 
  cites 
  vocabs. 
  of 
  Shoshoni. 
  Wihinasht, 
  Uta, 
  Comanch, 
  Piede 
  or 
  Pa-uta, 
  

   Chemuhuevi, 
  Cahuillo, 
  Kioway, 
  the 
  latter 
  not 
  belonging 
  here). 
  

  

  >Cumanches, 
  Gallatin 
  in 
  Schoolcraft, 
  Ind. 
  Tribes, 
  III, 
  402, 
  1853. 
  

  

  >Netela-Kij, 
  Latham 
  (1853) 
  in 
  Trans. 
  Philolog. 
  Soc. 
  Lond., 
  vi,76, 
  1854 
  (composed 
  of 
  

   Netela 
  of 
  Hale, 
  San 
  Juan 
  Capistrano 
  of 
  Coulter, 
  San 
  Gabriel 
  of 
  Coulter, 
  Ki.j 
  of 
  

   Hale). 
  

  

  >C'apistrano, 
  Latham 
  in 
  Proc. 
  Philolog. 
  Soc. 
  Lond., 
  85, 
  1856 
  (includes 
  Netela. 
  of 
  San 
  

   Luis 
  Rey 
  and 
  San 
  Juan 
  Capistrano, 
  the 
  San 
  Gabriel 
  or 
  Kij 
  of 
  San 
  Gabriel 
  and 
  

   San 
  Fernando). 
  

  

  In 
  his 
  synopsis 
  of 
  the 
  Indian 
  tribes' 
  Gallatin's 
  reference 
  to 
  this 
  

   great 
  family 
  is 
  of 
  the 
  most 
  vague 
  and 
  unsatisfactory 
  sort. 
  He 
  speaks 
  

   of 
  "some 
  bands 
  of 
  Snake 
  Indians 
  or 
  Shoshonees, 
  living 
  on 
  the 
  waters 
  

   of 
  the 
  river 
  Columbia" 
  (p. 
  120), 
  which 
  is 
  almost 
  the 
  only 
  allusion 
  to 
  

   them 
  to 
  be 
  found. 
  The 
  only 
  real 
  claim 
  he 
  possesses 
  to 
  the 
  author- 
  

   ship 
  of 
  the 
  family 
  name 
  is 
  to 
  be 
  found 
  on 
  page 
  306, 
  where, 
  in 
  his 
  list 
  

  

  'Trans, 
  and 
  Coll. 
  Am. 
  Antiq. 
  Soc. 
  II, 
  1836. 
  

  

  