224 CRETACEOUS GASTROPODA 
These differences are very important, they give a totally different character to the 
ornamentation of the shell and are clearly exhibited in Goldfuss’ figures, from 
which—I must repeat—all my conclusions are drawn. Still, unless the contrary 
can be proved by Goldfuss’ original specimens themselves, I do not think, that 
there is sufficient reason to identify this species with the 7. nodosa of Romer. 
To T. Noeggerathiana most probably is to be referred the species, noted by 
J. Miller (Aach. Kreid., 1851, p. 32, pl. 4, fig. 18) as T. nodosa. The only 
objection, which could be raised against it, is the want of the thinner anterior ridge, 
but it may have been only obliterate or not developed, for the space between the 
ridge above and the suture corresponds with that of Goldfuss’ drawing. The Turr, 
quinquecincta, Goldf. var. in Binkhorst’s Monog. Gast. et Ceph. Maestricht, 1861, 
p- 29, pl. 1, fig. 2, is also probably the same. 
c. Turritella multistriata, Reuss., will be described subsequently. 
There is no difficulty in distinguishing any of these three species at the first 
glance from well preserved specimens, but in cases, in which the upper surface 
and the keels are much worn off, or when the specimens represent only the top- 
whorls, it is very difficult, indeed, to be quite certain of the determination. 
11.—TuRRITELLA (ZARIA) MULTISTRIATA, Reuss. Pl. XVII, Figs. 8-14, 16, 
1840. Turritella granulata (non Sow.) and ? propingua, Geinitz, Char. pt. I, pp. 44-45, Pl. XV, 
Figs. 8-12. 
1843. 3 multistriata, Reuss, Geog. Skizzen, Bohm., pt. IT, p. 207. 
1844. 3 quadricincta, Hagenoviana and P velata, Goldf. Petr. Germ., pt. ITI, p. 106, 
Pl. CXCVI, Figs. 16 and 17e.; p. 108, Pl. CKCVII, Figs. 5—6 (non seweincta, 
Goldf.). 
1845. 3 multistriata, Reuss, Bohm. Kreid., pt. I, p. 51, Pl. X, Fig. 17, and Pl. XT, Fig. 16. 
1846, of 4 ee a pt. IT, p. 114. 
1846, »  Sowerbyi, Forbes, Trans. Geol. Soc., Lond., VII, p. 124, Pl. XV, Fig. 4, 
1847. ay Calypso, D’Orbigny, Voy. Astrol. Paléont., Atlas, Pl. III, Figs. 28-30, 
1850. 3 multistriata, Reuss, in Geinitz’ Quader., p. 124. 
1850. a Cenomanensis and ? Geinitzii, d’Orbignyi, Prod. II, p. 148, 
1851. tH) multistriata, Rss., Miller, Monog. Aach. Kreid., pt. II, p. 27, Pl. IV, Fig. 1, (exclud- 
ing 7. quinquecincta, Goldf. and Dupiniana, d’Orb.). 
1851. »  quinguelineata, Hagenoviana and ?gothica. Miller, ibid., pp. 28 and 29, Pl. IV, 
Figs. 3 and 8. 
1852. co dificilis, Zekeli, Abhandl. Geol. Reichs.-Anst., Wien, Vol. I, pt. 2, p. 23, Pl. I, 
Fig. 3 (non idem d’Orbigny). 
1853. an difficilis, Zek., Reuss. in Sitzungsb. Akad., Wien, Vol. XI, p. 884. 
1862. ‘3 multistriata, Hagenoviana, quinguelineata, ?gothica, in Pictet’s Pal. Suisse, Ser. III, 
p. 322-323, 
1865. a Hagenoviana, Miinst., Stoliczka in Sitzb. Akad., Wien, Vol. LIT, Revision, etc., p. 9, 
1866. 54 quadiicincta, Goldf. Petr. Germ., nov. edit., Pl, C, Figs. 16 and 17c, Giebel’s Reper- 
torium, p. 107. 
Turr. testa elongata, anfractibus sub-convexis, spiraliter 38-5—liratis, liris tribus 
anterioribus fortioribus, duabus posterioribus semper tenuioribus, im anfractibus 
minoribus sepissime una, nonnunquam utraque, evanescentibus ; liris omnibus in 
adultis levigatis, in junioribus sepe sub-granulosis, striis minutissimis miterpositis 
alternantibus ; basi producta, convexa, spiraliter obsolete striata, ad peripheriam 
