OF SOUTHERN INDIA. 287 
specifically naming this fragment. ‘The strie of growth appear in one place to 
show a tendency to be insinuated, and this makes it probable that the species 
belongs to Chemnitzia. 
There are alsoin our collection several fragments of a very large and similarly 
formed species, found in calcareous sandstone near Moraviatoor, but we are 
not certain of their identity. The fragments are all too imperfect for specific 
description. 
Locality.—Near Shillagoody, in yellowish siliceous sandstone. 
Formation.—Arrialoor group. 
3. CHEMNITZIA? sp. Pl. XXI, Fig. 2. 
Spiral angle 35°; sutural angle 6°. 
Approximate height of one whorl : its width (considered as 1:00) ese) 0300: 
This is another fragmentary specimen, of which the surface and the aperture are 
likewise not well preserved, but most probably the species belongs to Chemnitzia. 
The basis of the last volution is spirally striated, and the inner lip is of considerable 
thickness. Its specific distinction from the former is exhibited in the two figures. 
Locality—K. of Anapaudy, in yellowish calcareous sandstone. 
Formation.—Trichinopoly group. 
b. Sub-family,—ERULIMIN ZA. 
(Vide fam. Loziuip# in H. and A. Adams’ Genera, p. 235). 
1. Hulima, Risso, 1826, (H. and A. Adams’ Gen. I, p. 236). 
2. Leiostraca, H. and A. Adams, 1853, (Gen. I, p. 237). The white shells 
of Hulima being covered with an enamel coat and generally having the apex 
irregularly twisted, can easily be distinguished from the recent variegated species of 
Leiostraca, but among fossils it is as yet difficult to ascertain satisfactorily these 
distinctions. 
As regards the cretaceous species of Hulima I must be contented to refer to 
Pictet and Campiche’s last review in the Mat. p. 1. Pal. Suisse, 8me. Ser., p. 271. 
I cannot at present hazard the slightest conjecture as to how many of those species 
will remain in the genus Hulima, or have to be transferred to other genera. Of the 
four species, described by Zekeli from the Gosau-deposits, the #. turrita has been 
referred to Pseudo-Melania, and the others belong to Keilostoma of the Rissomz 
(vide Sitzungsb. Akad., Wien, 1865, LIT, Revis. etc., p. 20). The EHulima acuminata, 
Miller, is a Rissoina (vide p. 280); Hulima Cenomanensis, Guéranger, is a 
Keilostoma (vide p. 281); Hulima amphora, D’Orb., is a Euchrysalis. The Eulima 
seminosa, Gabb, 1860, (Proc. Phil. Acad., p. 197, pl. 3, fig. 6,) is perhaps a true 
Eulima. Prof. Forbes described from Sth. India a Hul. antiqua, which will be 
found mentioned hereafter. 
3. Apicalia, A. Adams (Mag. Nat. Hist., 1862, IX, p. 295,) only differs from 
Hulima by a more mucronate and distorted apex ; the typical species A. gibba is 
from the-Japan seas. 
