14, CRETACEOUS PELECYPODA 



51-5S. — ,/. Aslieriana, Carteroiii, Marullensis, Corntieliana of d'Orbigny, A. injiata, Ag., 

 sp., A. ralmiffifiisis, P. ami Camp., ./. Orbigni/ana, Loriol, ,/. /jrevisxima, P. and C, are all spi'cies 

 oi Anafina ; the last may belong' to the sub-geuus P/t?f^<?;//ytf, should this really prove to be distinct 

 from Analina. 



59-GO. — A. Robiiialdimi, d'Orb., A. giinfUis, P. and Camp., belong to the sub-genus Cer- 

 comya ; the first was also found by Coquand in the Aptien of Spain. 



CI. — A. Bhodan'i, V. and R. (closely allied to Munilleiisis), and A. IMerti, P. and Ren., are 

 Anatina ; the last species is a peculiar form, like a Gressfya. 



6iJ-61.. — A. tfiraci/ormia, Buv., A. Roj/ana, d'Orb., A. Nadclasi are Anafina. 



65-GS. — A. lanceoldfit, Gein., /uirpa* Kner, and elougata, Reu.ss, belong to the sub-genus Cer- 

 comya, but they are based upon such bad or imperfect specimens that a good specific determination 

 is quite impossible. 



69. — A. prodiida, Zittcl, is a Cercomya (vide Denksch. Akad., 'Wien, xxiv, pi. ii, p. 114>, &e.). 

 The same author also described A. Roy ana, d'Orb., from the Gosau deposits of the Austrian Alps. 



70. — A. Cenomanensis, Gueranger (Album paleont. de la Sarthe, pi. xv, fig. 7), is a Cercomya. 



71- — Anafina solenoides, d'Orb., (Siid.-Bayerns Leth. Geogn. by Schafhoeutl, 1863, p. 175, 

 ]>i. xliv, fig. 3). If tliis at all belongs to the Ay.iTixiDj:, of whicli there is no distinct proof, it 

 would belong to the group of the compressed forms which Agassi z called Flafymya. The shell is 

 said to be a cretaceous one, but it certainly has very little or nothing in common with the Phola- 

 doniya solenoides of Deshayes, which d'Orbigny places in Anafina. 



72. — A. riiffosa, Bell., non Lam. (!Mem. Soc. Gcol., France, ii. ser., vol. iv, p. 233, pi. xvi, 

 fig. 13). Anummulitic species fi-om the neighbourhood of Nice is quoted by Eichwa Id (Leth. Ross., 

 livr. xi, 1867, p. 727,) from some cretaceous strata of Russia. The identification may well he ques- 

 tioned, judging from Eichwald's description, who states that the posterior side is longer than the 

 anterior, while in Bellardi's species the contrary is the case. Bellardi's species itself is by no means 

 certain to be an Analina ; it is more probablj- a T/iracia, but should it prove to be either one or the 

 other, its specific name has to be changed. 



78. — A. (Cercomya) acuminafa, Eichwald, Leth. Ross., livr. xi, p. 728. 



7i- — A. Jeftei, Coq., is an Anafina, and rather like A. Royana. 



75-76.— Meek quotes in No. 177 of the Smith. Misc. Coll. (p. 14) A. ellij)fica, Gabb, and 

 sulcatina, Shumard. — Anaf. columbiana has been already mentioned (p. 73). 



77-80. — A. Tryoniana, A. incequiJaferalis, and A. tafa are described by Gabb in the Paheont. 

 of California, (vol. i, p. 150, &c.). Tlie first and second have the usual compressed form of creta- 

 ceous Ana fi nee J the last looks more like a caste of an Acropaffia than that of an J//(/^«ff ; Anaf. 

 qnadrafa, Gabb, (ibid. vol. ii, p. 177,) may also represent a TeUinomya or a Corimya. 



81- — Aitaf. (Cercomya) arcuafa, Forbes, is the only species of axatininj: from the South Indian 

 cretaceous deposits ; the species is quoted by Bosquet also as occurring in the upper cretaceous 

 deposits of Limbourg. 



82-Sl. — Anafimya anferadiafa, postmlcafa, and papyra of Conrad, sec No. 177 of Smiths. 

 Misc. Coll., p. 11.. 



Species of, and allied to, Pholadomya (see Mat. p. 1. Pal. Suisse, iv ser., S"^ pt., p. 90). 

 Most of the cretaceous species of Pholadomya belong to the section MCLT/COSTatj:, to which also the 

 recent species is referable, and to the OYVL.iTJi or PACCICOSTAT.-E, only a few to the CARDlsSOiDi:s 



and THrAXGULARES. 



85-90. — PA. piganfea, Sow., elonyafa, Miinst., PA. semicostafa, Ag., PA. Galloprorincialit, 

 Math., P/. Figeriana, Cotteau, PA. alfernans, Romer, (all are MVLTIcOST.atj:) ; — PA. miniifn, 

 hoiiol, (CAHDISS.);— PA. Guilleroni, P. and C.,(orLL.J :—PA. icapAoides,Ag., sp. (may as well be a 



• Latilj redescribed by Favre, Doscript. d. Moll. foss. dc Lvuiberg, GeuOvc, 1869, p. 107- 



