OF SOUTIIERX INDIA. 195 



73. — /. IlehcrCi, Favre, 1. cit., p. 11.-^^ lias quite the external furm of a (ilos.vi.% hut tlie hinge 

 is unknown. 



73. — I. planidorsata, Zitt., is either a Glossocardia or a J^eniUcardia. 



74-8i. — Coquand (Monog. l5tage Aptien de I'Espagne, lS(i5, p. 109, fee.,) descrihes the 

 following : — Cj/prina expansa, C. aquilaleralis , C. curvirost.ris, C. cariiiata, C. iuornata, C. Saussuri, 

 and C. modesta j Isocardia pusilla and Iso. nasiita ; Ci/pricardia secans and C. nucleus ; of none 

 of these species are the hinge-teeth known, and the generic determination is, therefore, quite 

 prohleniatic. 



85. — Isocardia crenatida, Con., is mentioned by Fraas from Palestine, (Wiirt. Jahresh., xxiii, 

 1867, p. 238). 



86. — Cijpirina p'lngu'is, Gueranger, (Album paleon. Dept. de la Sarthe, 18G7, pi. 17, figs. 2-3) ; 

 UD certain. 



87-88. — Isocardia massagelica, Eichw., and /. rentricosa, Pusch, are noticed by Eichwald 

 (Leth. Ross., llvr. xi, 1SG7, p. 701, &c.,) as occurring in cretaceous roeks of Russia; they only 

 externally agree with Glossiis. 



89-96. — C^2^. exiniia, Eichw., C. Cancriniana, d'Orb., C transversa, Eichw., C. cincta, 

 Eichw., ? C. Syssolce, Keys., C, KJioroschovensis and C. lavis, Rouil., C. Ilelmerseniana, d'Orb., 

 are also recorded by Eichwald from cretaceous deposits, (ibid. p. 661, &c., &c.) ; of not a single 

 species, however, have the hinge-teeth been examined. 



97-99. — Ci/p. Millleri, (^Cyp. rostrata, Sow., apud Miiller), C. van-Eei/i, (^=Ci/p. Ligeriensis 

 d'Orb., apud Miiller), and Cijpricardia riujata are mentioned as new by Dr. Bosquet from the 

 cretaceous deposits at Aachen (see Foss. fauna en flora van Het Krijt v. Limburg, extract from 

 Staring's Bodem v. Nederland, pt. ii, numb. 377, 378, and 380). 



100-109. — Cyprina Nicaisei, frajiezoidalis and africana ; Cypricardia Ther sites ; Isocardia. 

 aqnilina, Juh(e, numida, neglecla, gettiUna and Moevusi ave descriljed as new species by Coquand 

 from the Province Constantine ; looking at them from a couehological point of view they are 

 scarcely worth recording. 



110-112. — Cypricardia Galiciana, Favre, (=CrassateUa tricarinata, Kner.,) and C. parallela, 

 (Crassatella idem, Alth.,) are described by Favre in his descript. d. Moll. foss. de Lemberg, 

 1869, p. 109; both have the form of Tra^iezium. 



From America the following are recorded by Meek in his Check-list of cretaceous shells of the 

 United States (1864, Smith. Misc. Coll., No. 177). 



113-125. — Glossus Moreauensis, Washita and Conradi of Gabb; Cyprina compressa and ovata of 

 Meek and Hayden; Venilia Conradi, Mort., V. humilis, M. and H., V. Gahbana, M., V. Mortoni, 

 M. and H., V. suhtmnida, M., V, rhomboidea and trapezoidea^ Conr., V. trigoua, Gabbj V. Lapliami, 

 Shum. sp. 



126. — Conrad in his Check-list of eocene fossils (Smiths. Misc. Coll., No. 200,) quotes 

 Cijprina bisecta from the lower eocene beds which Gabb and other geologists pronounce to be 

 cretaceous. 



137. — Trapezium carinatum, Gabb, Pal. Calif., i, p. 170. 



128. — Cypricardia texana, Romer, (Kreidegeb. von Texas, p. 50); hinge not known; the shell 

 has the appearance of an Area. 



129. — Goniosoma injlata, Conrad, vide p. 191. 



Schafhseutl (Siid. Bayerns Leth. Geogn., 1863, pp. 265 and 268,) has an Isocardia ovum and 

 a Cyprina acuminata, but whether those insufficient casts to which these names have been appheJ 

 are cretaceous or not the author does not say. 



130-132. — In the South Indian cretaceous deposits five species of G LOSS was occur ; none of 

 them were noticed by Prof. Forbes, for the only species which he describes as Isocardia snl/sinuata 



