488 CEETACEOUS PELECYPODA 



A new species of a Uq^ptirite is also described by Pirona, vol. xi, fasc. iii, of 

 the Atti della soc. ital. di sc. nat. I have not seen the publication itself. 



Family, — Lucisidje. 



On page 252 add — 



17«. ZJuicardmm tumidum, Briart et Cornet, (Foss. do Bracquegnies, 1868, 

 p. 68, pi. vii, figs. 6-7, in M6m. Coin-. Acad., Belg., vol. xxxiv). 



'Family, — TJhovlinid^. 



On page 261, at the end, add — 



8. Tenea, Conrad, 1870, (Am. Journ. Conch., VI, p. 72). Shell roundly 

 ovate, thin, tumid; left valve under the apex with a A -shaped tooth, the anterior 

 lobe of which is continued along the anterior margin of the shell, separated by a 

 deep groove from it ; in the right valve are two cardinal teeth united above, the 

 anterior is falcate, with a pit on each side, the posterior curved and directed 

 obliquely backwards ; type, T. par His fJIysia jjarilisj, Conrad, noticed under the 

 latter name on p. 262, under No. 4. 



Family, — A startidm. 



On page 287 add — 



127rt. Astarte ? staminea, Conrad, (Am. Joiirn. Conch., VI, p. 73,) from 

 Ripley county, Mississippi. 



143a. Cardita corrugata, Rss., ftenuicosta apud E,euss, Boehmische Kreidef., 

 p. 4). Giimbel (Abhandl. Akad., Miinchen, x, p. 568,) considers the Bohemian 

 species as distinct from the English, and retains for it the name originally 

 given to it by Reuss. 



159«. Cardita Konincici, Briart et Cornet, (Foss. de Bracquegnies, 1868, 

 p. 70, pi. vii, figs. 8-9, in M^m. Cour. Acad., Belg., vol. xxxiv). 



159&. Cardita spinosa, B. and C. (ibidem p. 71, pi. vii, figs. 12, 13, and 16). 



Family, — CeassatellibjE. 



On page 294, last line in the foot note, for No. 109, read 112. 



On page 295 — No. 65, Crassatella Eatishonensis, Giimbel, (Corresp.-Blatt des 

 Zool. Min. Vereins zu Regensburg, xxii, 1868, p. 66, pi. 1, fig. 4,) is based upon 

 imperfect casts from the cretaceous beds near Eegensburg. 



Family, — Nuculid^. 



Page 327, No. 66. Gumbel (in Neues Jahrbuch f. Mineralog. for 1865, 

 p. 148,) says that the original of N. maxima does not admit even of a generic 

 determination. The name, as likewise that which follows, should be altogether 

 omitted. 



