E d 
dial ARCHEOLOGY IN BRITISH GUIANA 265 
Srna | 
6 
PR a x4 
= 
Pervez} Bl 
ie Sods. fy PNKARBADt 
Yrananievr nn : MARUDIKSTAUA 
% mies kKimigaruana 
a ALIR DAD 
“PErRoouvens fs MARIWIDWANTAUA 
aod? naun' 
Z 
ty] 
bs ant 
S Asuaina 
| KUOURUILAMIRE 
> $ A BURISHONAWA 
at 
wjy WARAIPURAU 
Me ee (ez 
< sae . 3 
-= 
9 RY te ° ‘ ¢ i 
= K > Fo y 
a g——~ATEw, a, ai f- WABOTURIA: CATy p. YARUMA V. 
> < 
: Te fs <= Bs WAMUAY 
pap Say 4] © 
; By 
ae ese 5 4 
iN Gg 
A y 
cpu 2 
S 
igs i) 
2 
of e (Piniriny: Mr. 
aa ee penn 
. . y > bor ey 
gat > % S 
Ni ond wnat od ae. ga 
. s « $ 
ra Mages dy, mes aus le Ss Ay oo a 
- r)\) 
ants My : 
gyn UN Eas i 
Zaypad ¥S fie Re ie Lo es a wt Ne a. car eehl 
2, a 7 Nels TW uy 
ta AY att Hn 
Pa ays Teg 
% ne 
et % bam sacs a 
Ficure 108.—Part of Farabee’s map of the upper Essequibo area showing the location of 
Taruma villages at the time of his visit in 1914 (after Farabee, 1917). 
1917), but if the field notes are accurate, E-25 must be considered. 
The only other site in the area, E-28, seems too far below the “Duer- 
wow” (Kassikaityu) to fit Farabee’s description. 
In this ambiguous situation, an examination of the archeological 
sites may produce some helpful clues. Since Farabee’s visit came 
