HARRINGTON] PLACE-NAMES 495 



[29:58] Santo Domingo "Gi-pu-y" Puehlo ruin, see [28:117]. 

 [29:59] Span. Hoya cle la Piedra Parada 'dell of the standing rock'. 

 What rock is referred to is not known. This dell is south or 

 southeast of Span. Hoya Apache [29:30]. 

 [29:r.O] Domino-o settlement, see [28:115]. 

 [29:t:i] Santo Domingo Pueblo, see [28:109]. 

 [29:62] (1) Eng. Ortiz settlement. (<Span.). = Span. (2). 

 (2) Span. Ortiz, a Span, family name. =Eng. (1). 

 This settlement appears to give one of the names to the moun- 

 tains [29:72]. 

 [29:(;3] Cochiti Katftfafonia Pueblo ruin, see [28:l(i2]. 

 [29:64] Borrego Creek, see [28:104:]. 

 [29:65] (1) SanFelipe(?) "Comitre."' 



'La Proviiicia tie los Cheres [Keresans] con los pueblos de Castixes, llamados 

 Sant Phelipe y de Comitre.' We find herein a corrupted form the Indian 

 names both of the pueblo [29:66] and of the round mesa [29:65] at the foot 

 of which it stood. 'Castixes' is a corruption of Kat-ist-ya, and 'Comitre' 

 stands for Ta-mi-ta. The error was probably made in copying the document 

 for the press. - 



(2) San Felipe "Ta-mi-ta."^ From what Bandelier states,^ it is 

 evident that he obtained this name and the tradition in which it 

 occurs from a San Felipe informant. No etymology is given. 



This is a small, black mesa, east of the Rio Grande and north of 

 Tunque Arroyo [29:70]. "The mesa of Ta-mi-ta, a height in the 

 shape of a truncated cone, nearly opposite San Felipe [29:09], on 

 the east bank of the Rio Grande."* See [29:61]. 

 [29:66] (1) San Felipe and Cochiti Kdtftfafoma 'old San Felipe' 

 {Kdfftfa 'San Felipe Pueblo'; foma 'old'), according to Ban- 

 delier, although the present writer did not get information to that 

 effect as he did in the case of [29:63]. See quoted forms under 

 [29:69]. 



(2) Span. San Felipe 'Saint Philip'. See quoted forms under 

 [29:69]. 



Bandelier has determined that this is a historical village of the 

 San Felipe Indians, having been abandoned bj' them at the end of 

 the seventeenth century. According to the same authority it was 

 the second pueblo of Kdtftfa of the San Felipe Indians. Only 

 a paragraph from Bandelier is here quoted; the reader is referred 

 to [29:69] for a fuller treatment of San Felipe and its former 

 sites. 



Not a trace is left of the old pueblcj [29: 66] near the round mesa of Ta-mi-ta 

 [29:65]. The village, the church, and its convent have completely disappeared. 



■Obediencia y Vassalnje de San Juan Beptista (1598), p. 114, quoted and identified with "Ta-mi-ta" 

 by Bandelier. Final Report, pt. ii, p. 189, note, 1892. 

 2 Bandelier, ibid, 

 nbid., pp. 188-90. 

 <Ibid., p. 188. 



